Microsoft Corporation v. TiVo, Inc.
INTERIM ORDER re 26 Parties' Proposed Form of Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 6/15/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 6/15/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion. OR D E R, page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TIVO, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 10-0240 RS (PVT) INTERIM ORDER RE PARTIES' PR O PO SED FORM OF STIPULATED PR O T E C T IV E ORDER (Re: Docket No. 26)
Currently pending before the court is the parties' Stipulation for Protective Order.1 Based on the parties proposed form of order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than July 9, 2010, the parties shall submit a revised form of protective order based on this court's model form of "Stipulated Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information And/or Trade Secrets," copies of which are available in the Forms section of the court's website (www.cand.uscourts.gov). As drafted, the parties' current proposed form of order contains numerous provisions that are unacceptable to the court. If the parties wish to deviate from the model form of order, they shall submit a joint brief setting forth each portion of alternate language they wish to use, and explaining
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
why the alternate language is reasonably necessary for this case. Dated: 6/15/10 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge
OR D E R, page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?