Washington v. Sandoval et al

Filing 110

ORDER granting request for telephone conferences. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 JESSE WASHINGTON, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 Case No. 10-CV-250-LHK (NJV) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE D. SANDOVAL, et al., 16 Defendant. 17 The Court held a settlement conference on January 30, 2013. At the settlement 18 conference, Plaintiff’s counsel stated that she is unable to establish telephonic contact with her 19 client. The Court finds that such telephonic contact is necessary for Plaintiff’s Counsel to further 20 discuss settlement. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have three 21 telephonic conferences of one hour in length with his counsel prior to the February 21, 2013 22 settlement status report deadline. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 February 4, 2013 Dated: January 31, 2013 25 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE Case No. 10-cv-250-LHK (JNV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?