Washington v. Sandoval et al
Filing
110
ORDER granting request for telephone conferences. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
JESSE WASHINGTON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
Case No. 10-CV-250-LHK (NJV)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONE
CONFERENCE
D. SANDOVAL, et al.,
16
Defendant.
17
The Court held a settlement conference on January 30, 2013. At the settlement
18
conference, Plaintiff’s counsel stated that she is unable to establish telephonic contact with her
19
client. The Court finds that such telephonic contact is necessary for Plaintiff’s Counsel to further
20
discuss settlement. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have three
21
telephonic conferences of one hour in length with his counsel prior to the February 21, 2013
22
settlement status report deadline.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
February 4, 2013
Dated: January 31, 2013
25
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
Case No. 10-cv-250-LHK (JNV)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
