Washington v. Sandoval et al
Filing
98
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 97 Stipulation (lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
JESSE WASHINGTON,
13
14
15
v.
C 10-0250 LHK
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
D. SANDOVAL, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
The parties’ Stipulation that Plaintiff shall withdraw his First Amended Complaint and file
20
a Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter on or before January 9, 2013 and
21
that Defendants will be provided an extension of time to file an Answer or otherwise respond to
22
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until January 11, 2013 having been considered, it is decided
23
that the Stipulation shall be GRANTED.
24
It is, therefore, ORDERED, that Plaintiffs shall file a Second Amended Complaint on or
25
before January 9, 2012 and Defendants shall respond in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
26
Procedure 12(a). Alternatively, if Plaintiff does not file a Second Amended Complaint,
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order
Washington v. Sandoval, et al., (C 10-0250 LHK)
1
2
3
Defendants shall have until January 11, 2013 to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
First Amended Complaint.
Dated:
January 2
, 2013
4
Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order
Washington v. Sandoval, et al., (C 10-0250 LHK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?