UPEK, Inc. v. Authen Tec, Inc.

Filing 158

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 151 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/2/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY A. MILLER (SBN 160602) jmiller@orrick.com MATTHEW J. HULT (SBN 197137) matthult@orrick.com MONTE M.F. COOPER (SBN 196746) mcooper@orrick.com SIDDHARTHA M. VENKATESAN (SBN 245008) svenkatesan@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiff UPEK, Inc. ERIC J. AMDURSKY (SBN 180288) eamdursky@omm.com JUSTIN D. WALKER (SBN 252268) jwalker@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 DAVID S. ALMELING (SBN 235449) dalmeling@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff UPEK, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UPEK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counter-claimant, v. UPEK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counter-defendant. CASE NO. 10-cv-00424 JF (PVT) ------- PO - ED] STIPULATION AND [PRO-----S----ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE OHS West:260944899.2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 10-CV-00424 JF (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 After the June 25, 2010 hearing, the parties met and conferred further concerning UPEK's proposed motion to amend its Complaint and while no compromise was reached, the parties did agree to a briefing schedule to expedite consideration of UPEK's motion. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit the following proposed briefing schedule and proposed order: EVENT UPEK files Motion for Leave to Amend AuthenTec files any Opposition to UPEK's Motion UPEK files any Reply DEADLINE June 30, 2010 July 8, 2010 July 15, 2010 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 1, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP /s/ Matthew J. Hult /s/ Matthew J. Hult Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant UPEK, INC. Dated: July 1, 2010 HOWREY LLP /s/ Denise De Mory /s/ Denise De Mory Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff AUTHENTEC, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/2 , 2010 Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge Northern District of California OHS West:260944899.2 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 10-CV-00424 JF (PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?