Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)

*E-Filed 11/1/10*
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Doc. 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Ramiro Morales ­ 167947 [e-mail] Christine M. Fierro ­ 191660 [e-mail] MORALES FIERRO & REEVES 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Suite 310 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN JOSE DIVISION TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:10-CV-00441-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE

LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant.

Trial: April 11, 2011 Hon. Richard Seeborg

Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") and defendant Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation ("Defendant"), by and through counsel, stipulate and agree that in accordance with a settlement reached between the parties and pursuant to FRCP 41, this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO AGREED.

DATED: October 29, 2010

MORALES, FIERRO & REEVES

By:___/s/Curtis R. Ogilvie ____________ RAMIRO MORALES CURTIS R. OGILVIE Attorneys for Plaintiff, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 5:10-CV-0441-RS

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DATED: October 28, 2010

BURNHAM BROWN

By: ___David H. Waters__________________ DAVID H. WATERS Attorney for Defendant, LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION

The Court, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, orders that this matter is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Dated: November ___, 2010
________________________________ The Hon. Richard Seeborg

2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 5:10-CV-0441-RS