Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 11/1/10* Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation Doc. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ramiro Morales 167947 rmorales@mfrlegal.com Christine M. Fierro 191660 cogilvie@mfrlegal.com MORALES FIERRO & REEVES 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Suite 310 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 288-1776 Facsimile: (925) 288-1856 Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:10-CV-00441-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. Trial: April 11, 2011 Hon. Richard Seeborg Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") and defendant Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation ("Defendant"), by and through counsel, stipulate and agree that in accordance with a settlement reached between the parties and pursuant to FRCP 41, this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO AGREED. DATED: October 29, 2010 MORALES, FIERRO & REEVES By:___/s/Curtis R. Ogilvie ____________ RAMIRO MORALES CURTIS R. OGILVIE Attorneys for Plaintiff, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 5:10-CV-0441-RS Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 28, 2010 BURNHAM BROWN By: ___David H. Waters__________________ DAVID H. WATERS Attorney for Defendant, LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION The Court, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, orders that this matter is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: November ___, 2010 ________________________________ The Hon. Richard Seeborg 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 5:10-CV-0441-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?