Buccellato v. AT&T Inc.,

Filing 44

STIPULATION and ORDER re 42 Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Request for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry by December 16, 2010. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/13/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)

Buccellato v. AT&T Operations, Inc.,

Doc. 44

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716) Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887) Anne B. Shaver (Cal. Bar No. 255928) Jaron R. Shipp (Cal. Bar No. 264401) LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] Adam T. Klein (admitted pro hac vice) Justin M. Swartz (admitted pro hac vice) Rachel M. Bien (admitted pro hac vice) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP 3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Class Members UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MATTHEW BUCCELLATO, on behalf of himself and a class of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AT&T Operations, Inc. Defendant. Case No. C10-00463-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

902749.1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C10-00463-LHK

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
902749.1

The parties hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the operative complaint in this action is the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, the First Amended Complaint includes claims only under federal and California law; WHEREAS, several individuals have contacted Plaintiff's counsel to serve as class representatives asserting classwide claims under Colorado, New Jersey, New York, and North Carolina law; and WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the amendment, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court to grant Plaintiff leave to file the Second Amended Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit A) adding four plaintiffs and classwide claims under the laws of Colorado, New Jersey, New York, and North Carolina. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 30, 2010 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi JAHAN C. SAGAFI

Counsel for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class Dated: November 30, 2010 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY, & WALKER LLP By: /s/ Thomas E. Geidt THOMAS E. GEIDT

Counsel for Defendant AT&T Operations, Inc.

-1-

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C10-00463-LHK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
902749.1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff shall file the Second PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry by Thursday, December 16, 2010. 13, 2010 Dated: December ____, 2010

The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

-2-

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C10-00463-LHK