TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 238

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER CORPORATION AND PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC. re 234 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/16/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)

Download PDF
TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al Doc. 238 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ronald J. Schutz (Pro Hac Vice pending), RJSchutz@rkmc.com Richard M. Martinez (Pro Hac Vice), RMMartinez@rkmc.com Sang Young A. Brodie (Pro Hac Vice), SYBrodie@rkmc.com ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 800 LaSalle Avenue, 2800 LaSalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 349-8500 Facsimile: (612) 339-4181 David Martinez, (CA Bar No. 193183), DMartinez@rkmc.com ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 Attorneys for Plaintiff, TV INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TV INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. SONY CORPORATION; SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC.; SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC.; SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; ROYAL PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, L.L.C.; PANASONIC CORPORATION; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.; JVC AMERICAS CORP.; LG ELECTRONICS, INC.; LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.; ZENITH ELECTRONICS LLC; PIONEER CORPORATION; PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC.; SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; FUNAI ELECTRIC CO., LTD.; FUNAI CORPORATION, INC.; D&M HOLDINGS INC.; D&M HOLDINGS US, INC.; AND DENON ELECTRONICS (USA), LLC, Defendants. Case No. C 10-00475 JF 81848931.1 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS Case No. C 10-00475 JF STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER CORPORATION AND PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC. AND ------------------[PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, Civ. L.R. 7-12, and the agreement of the parties, TV Interactive Data Corporation ("TVI") and Pioneer Corporation and Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. (together "Pioneer"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On February 2, 2010, TVI filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California asserting claims of patent infringement under U.S. Patent Nos. 5,597,307, 5,795,156, 6,249,863, and 6,418,532. 2. 3. On May 3, 2010, Pioneer filed its Answer and Counterclaims. TVI and Pioneer have now reached an agreement to settle their differences relating ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to the above-captioned action. 4. All claims TVI asserted against Pioneer in the above-captioned action are hereby ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS dismissed with prejudice. The foregoing dismissal shall have no impact whatsoever on TVI's claims and rights against any party other than Pioneer. TVI is dismissing only its claims against Pioneer, and expressly maintains all of TVI's claims for relief against all other parties to this action. 5. All counterclaims Pioneer asserted against TVI in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 6. TVI and Pioneer each shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees in connection with the action. 7. TVI and Pioneer request that the Court reserve jurisdiction over this matter with respect to Pioneer to oversee and enforce the agreement between TVI and Pioneer. /// /// /// Case No. C 10-00475 JF 81848931.1 -1- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: November 15, 2010 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: /s/ Sang Young A. Brodie Ronald J. Schutz (Pro Hac Vice pending) Richard M. Martinez (Pro Hac Vice) Sang Young A. Brodie (Pro Hac Vice) ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 800 LaSalle Avenue, 2800 LaSalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 349-8500 Facsimile: (612) 339-4181 David Martinez, (CA Bar No. 193183) ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TV INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION I, Sang Young A. Brodie, the filer of this document attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Sherman W. Kahn. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 10-00475 JF 81848931.1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS -2- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: November 15, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: _/s/ Sherman W. Kahn__________________ Karen L. Hagberg (pro hac vice) KHagberg@mofo.com Sherman W. Kahn (CA SBN 168924) SKahn@mofo.com Hui Liu (pro hac vice) HLiu@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900 Bryan Wilson BWilson@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 Facsimile: 650.494.0792 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS PIONEER CORPORATION AND PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA), INC. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 10-00475 JF 81848931.1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS -3- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ALL CLAIMS TVI ASSERTED AGAINST PIONEER AND ALL COUNTERCLAIMS PIONEER ASSERTED AGAINST TVI IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION ARE HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/16/10 DATED: ____________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 10-00475 JF 81848931.1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS -4- STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I am employed in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 800 LaSalle Avenue 2800 LaSalle Plaza, Minneapolis Minnesota 55402. On November 15, 2010 I served the foregoing document described as STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND PIONEER CORPORATION AND PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER on the interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: See Attached Service List [1 I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Minneapolis, Minnesota. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. BY MAIL: 1] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS - OVERNIGHT: I caused such envelope to be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by Federal Express in an envelope or package designated by Federal Express with delivery fees paid. 11 BY FACSIMILE: I served a true copy of the document(s) described on all parties to this action by facsimile transmission, and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. Facsimile transmissions were sent and addressed as stated above. 11 [X] [X] BY PE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?