Chacanaca et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
Filing
170
ORDER DENYING MOTION 169 TO VACATE HEARING, AND RESETTING HEARING DATE. Motion Hearing set for 2/6/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
IN RE QUAKER OATS LABELING
LITIGATION
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
VACATE HEARING, AND
RESETTING HEARING DATE
14
15
16
No. C 10-0502 RS
____________________________________/
Plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement reached between
17
the parties, and set it for hearing on less notice than required by Civil Local Rule 7. The parties
18
subsequently moved jointly to vacate the hearing and to set a schedule for the remaining events in
19
the final settlement approval process. In consumer class actions such as this, it is generally the
20
Court’s preference to hold hearings at the preliminary approval stage, even where no impediment to
21
such approval is immediately apparent. While the standard for preliminary approval is liberal,
22
sufficiently detailed review of the settlement terms, the proposed notice plan, and similar matters
23
permits any minor issues to be identified and addressed prior to the expenditure of time and money
24
in giving notice to the class, and therefore can facilitate final approval. Accordingly, the request to
25
submit the matter without a hearing is denied, and the hearing will be continued to February 6, 2014
26
at 1:30 p.m.
27
28
NO. C 10-0502 RS
ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: 1/6/14
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 10-0502 RS
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?