izmo CRM, Inc v. Prize Corporation

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 79 Ex Parte Application (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)

Case5:10-cv-00518-LHK Document81 Filed11/08/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

JOHN DINAPOLI (SBN 84365)
STEVEN J. SIBLEY (SBN 152365)
DINAPOLI & SIBLEY
Ten Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1250
San Jose, CA 95113-2271
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
e-mail:
[e-mail]
ROBERT A. MCLEAN (Pro Hac Vice)
FARRIS BOBANGO BRANAN PLC
999 S. Shady Grove Road, Suite 500
Memphis, TN 38120
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
e-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
PRIZE CORPORATION, a Tennessee corporation

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

14
15

izmo CRM, INC.,

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,

Case No. 10-CV-00518-LHK
STIPULATED JUDGMENT

v.
PRIZE CORPORATION, a Tennessee
corporation, and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,

20
21

Defendants.
& RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

22
23

PURSUANT TO the written Stipulation for Entry of Judgment this Court has retained

24

jurisdiction of this matter, and accordingly, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of Defendant

25

and Counter-Claimant Prize Corporation against Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant izmo CRM,

26

Inc., in the sum of $40,000, plus $600 late fee, due and payable to Prize upon entry of this

27
Judgment.
28
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
ExParte.EnforceSettle.StipJudgment.wpd

Case No. 10-CV-00518-LHK

Case5:10-cv-00518-LHK Document81 Filed11/08/12 Page2 of 2

1
2
3

Failure to pay this Judgment immediately shall subject the assets of Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant izmo CRM, Inc. to levy and execution.

Pursuant to the Settlement

Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims post judgment interest on this Judgment shall be ten

4
per cent (10%) from the date izmoCRM failed to cure the default, which was Tuesday,
5
6

November 6, 2012. All costs of collection incurred after Tuesday, November 6, 2012, including

7

reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be added to the judgment amount and taxed to Plaintiff and

8

Counter-Defendant izmo CRM, Inc. pursuant to the procedure set forth under Federal Rule of

9

Civil Procedure 54(d).

10
11
12

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Judgment is final
and non-appealable.
Dated:

21
November ____, 2012

13
14

HON. LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED JUDGMENT
ExParte.EnforceSettle.StipJudgment.wpd

2

Case No. 10-CV-00518-LHK