PixArt Imaging, Inc v. Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte.Ltd., Inc et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONSE re 12 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/25/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Attorneys for Defendants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., Avago Technologies ECBU IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., and Avago Technologies USA, Inc.

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PixArt Imaging Inc., Plaintiff, v. Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., Avago Technologies ECBU IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., and Avago Technologies USA, Inc., Defendants. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00544-JW L HR (HRL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-11 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), Plaintiff PixArt Imaging Inc. ("PixArt") and Defendants Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., Avago Technologies ECBU IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Inc., and Avago Technologies USA, Inc. (collectively "Avago," and along with PixArt, "Parties") jointly submitted a request that the Court enter an order setting the time for filing an Opposition to PixArt's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related ("Administrative Motion") and extending the time for Avago to move, answer, or otherwise respond to PixArt's Complaint For Declaratory Judgment ("Complaint"). Having considered the Parties stipulated request and the declaration submitted in support

A

C

LI
2/25/2010

CLIFF A. MAIER (#248858) [e-mail] MAYER BROWN LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

FO

mes Wa Judge Ja

re

R NIA

DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

thereof, the Court hereby GRANTS the stipulated request and makes the following order: For the reasons set forth in the stipulated motion and supporting declaration and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that any response by Avago to PixArt's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related be filed by February 23, 2010, and that the time for Avago to move, answer, or otherwise respond to PixArt's Complaint For Declaratory Judgment is extended to March 31, 2010. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

February 25, 2010

__________________________________________ Honorable James rWareLloyd Howa d R. U.S. District Court Miagrict ate Judge D st istr

2