Adams v. Kraft et al

Filing 161

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

BERRY LYNN ADAMS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DANIEL L. KRAFT, a State of California Park )
Ranger, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND
RESPONSES
(re: docket #148)

16
On October 26, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an order extending the time to file
17
motions in limine from October 26, 2011 to October 31, 2011, and extending the time to file
18
responses to Defendants’ motions in limine from October 31, 2011 to November 4, 2011, due to an
19
ongoing family medical emergency. See Dkt. #148. The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s
20
request for an extension of time, based on the same grounds, to file an opposition to Defendants’
21
Motion for Summary Judgment and continued the September 15, 2011 hearing on that motion to
22
October 20, 2011. See Dkt. #130. Although the Court is certainly sympathetic to Plaintiff’s
23
situation, the Court is unable to grant Plaintiff’s request in full, as doing so would deprive
24
Defendants and the Court of time needed to prepare for the pretrial conference, which is scheduled
25
for November 7, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., and for the trial, which is set to begin on November 14, 2011,
26
at 9:00 a.m. The Court will not reschedule either of these dates.
27
28

1
Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND RESPONSES

1

Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff a one-day extension to file his motions in limine.

2

Plaintiff’s motions in limine are now due October 27, 2011. Plaintiff’s responses to Defendants’

3

motions in limine remain due October 31, 2011. Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s motions in

4

limine will be due November 1, 2011.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

Dated: October 26, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND RESPONSES