Adams v. Kraft et al

Filing 165

ORDER Directing Defendants to File Statement re: Trial Schedule. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/1/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

BERRY LYNN ADAMS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DANIEL L. KRAFT, a State of California Park )
Ranger, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER
(re: dkt #164)

It is not clear to the Court whether Defendants’ counsel was aware of the Court’s October

17

27, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff’s Request for an Order Postponing the Trial Date and setting a

18

new pretrial conference and trial schedule when Defendants’ counsel filed the Statement of Non-

19

opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Postpone the Trial Date on October 28, 2011. Defendants shall

20

file by November 4, 2011 a statement as to whether they oppose the December 20, 2011 pretrial

21

conference and January 3, 2012 trial dates and if so, the reasons for the opposition. The Court

22

rarely ever continues a trial and is set on having this trial as soon as possible.

23

At the summary judgment hearing, Defendants were unwilling to participate in any

24

alternative dispute resolution. In Defendants’ November 4, 2011 filing, they should indicate if that

25

is still their position.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated: November 1, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER