Adams v. Kraft et al

Filing 165

ORDER Directing Defendants to File Statement re: Trial Schedule. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/1/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BERRY LYNN ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DANIEL L. KRAFT, a State of California Park ) Ranger, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK ORDER (re: dkt #164) It is not clear to the Court whether Defendants’ counsel was aware of the Court’s October 17 27, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff’s Request for an Order Postponing the Trial Date and setting a 18 new pretrial conference and trial schedule when Defendants’ counsel filed the Statement of Non- 19 opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Postpone the Trial Date on October 28, 2011. Defendants shall 20 file by November 4, 2011 a statement as to whether they oppose the December 20, 2011 pretrial 21 conference and January 3, 2012 trial dates and if so, the reasons for the opposition. The Court 22 rarely ever continues a trial and is set on having this trial as soon as possible. 23 At the summary judgment hearing, Defendants were unwilling to participate in any 24 alternative dispute resolution. In Defendants’ November 4, 2011 filing, they should indicate if that 25 is still their position. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: November 1, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?