Adams v. Kraft et al
Filing
165
ORDER Directing Defendants to File Statement re: Trial Schedule. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/1/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
BERRY LYNN ADAMS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DANIEL L. KRAFT, a State of California Park )
Ranger, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER
(re: dkt #164)
It is not clear to the Court whether Defendants’ counsel was aware of the Court’s October
17
27, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff’s Request for an Order Postponing the Trial Date and setting a
18
new pretrial conference and trial schedule when Defendants’ counsel filed the Statement of Non-
19
opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Postpone the Trial Date on October 28, 2011. Defendants shall
20
file by November 4, 2011 a statement as to whether they oppose the December 20, 2011 pretrial
21
conference and January 3, 2012 trial dates and if so, the reasons for the opposition. The Court
22
rarely ever continues a trial and is set on having this trial as soon as possible.
23
At the summary judgment hearing, Defendants were unwilling to participate in any
24
alternative dispute resolution. In Defendants’ November 4, 2011 filing, they should indicate if that
25
is still their position.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: November 1, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?