Adams v. Kraft et al

Filing 178

ORDER denying 176 Request for Further Trial Continuance. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/21/12. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 BERRY LYNN ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL L. KRAFT, PHILLIP HAUCK, and K.P. BEST, Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR FURTHER TRIAL CONTINUANCE (re: dkt #176) 16 On March 14, 2012, Defendants filed a Request for Case Management Conference to 17 Discuss Trial Continuance (ECF No. 176), citing the same grounds for a trial continuance that the 18 Court already previously rejected at the December 7, 2011 Case Management Conference. See 19 ECF No. 173 (citing grounds); ECF No. 175 (CMO setting trial schedule). Accordingly, 20 Defendants’ request to further continue the trial in this case is DENIED, and the case management 21 conference set for April 4, 2012, is VACATED. The case schedule set forth in the December 7, 22 2011 Case Management Order remains in effect. The pretrial conference remains set for April 26, 23 2012, at 1:30 p.m., and the trial will begin on May 7, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: March 21, 2012 27 28 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 1 Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR FURTHER TRIAL CONTINUANCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?