Adams v. Kraft et al

Filing 227

ORDER Regarding Percipient Witness Testimony. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/4/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

BERRY LYNN ADAMS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DANIEL L. KRAFT, a State of California Park )
Ranger, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.

Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER EXCLUDING TESTIMONY OF
PERCIPIENT WITNESSES TO THE
JUNE 22, 2009 INCIDENT

Upon further reflection, any testimony of percipient witnesses to the June 22, 2009 incident
16
is irrelevant and inadmissible unless Plaintiff can establish that Defendants Kraft and Hauck were
17
aware of such information at the time they arrested Plaintiff Adams. Plaintiff has not established
18
that Defendants Kraft and Hauck were aware of such information in her pleadings or at the pretrial
19
conference. Should Plaintiff wish to make such a proffer, she must do so in writing by Monday,
20
May 7, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: May 4, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
1

Case No.: 10-CV-00602-LHK
ORDER EXCLUDING TESTIMONY OF PERCIPIENT WITNESSES TO THE JUNE 22, 2009 INCIDENT