Adams v. Kraft et al
Filing
232
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 215 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
Case5:10-cv-00602-LHK Document231 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 4
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
JOHN P. DEVINE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DANIELB.ALWEISS(SBN 191560)
HARRY T. GOWER, III (SBN 170784)
Deputy Attorneys General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1276
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: DanieI.Alweiss@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants Kraft, Hauck and Best
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
BERRY LYNN ADAMS,
13
5: 10-CV-00602-LHK
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
FACTS AND EXHIBITS
Trial Date:
May 7, 2012
DANIEL L. KRAFT, pmLLIP HAUCK,
KIRK LINGENFELTER, K. P. BEST, J. I.
STONE, CHIP BOCKMAN, R.
CALLISON, SCOTT SIPES,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Pursuant to the court's order at the May 3, 2012 Pretrial Conference, the parties stipulate to
the following facts, and stipulate to the admissibility ofthe following exhibits.
Stipulated Facts
22
23
24
25
a.
On February 14,2008, defendant Best cited the plaintiff for having an open container
of beer in violation of a County Code prohibiting open alcohol containers.
b.
A day or two later, defendant Best rescinded the citation he had issued to the plaintiff
26
for having an open container of beer in violation ofa County Code prohibiting open alcohol
27
containers.
28
Stipulation and Order re: Facts and Exhibits (5:10-CV-00602 LHK)
- - _......
_-----
Case5:10-cv-00602-LHK Document231 Filed05/07/12 Page2 of 4
'DL-\i';r'\~
:+he.- ,..,tLe- +., J
4
~ l, #te.- f 14~jI\+~
r---II---ct1. ~1J.,. v.y~ ~w my ht:t~S o..~ .,.~11~ 'Q)~"j l'U-\.Wi~"
c.
2
because State Park Rangers contacted him about complaints of disturbances.
3
4
In early June, 2009, the plaintiff complained to Park Superintendent Lingenfelter
d.
In response to the plaintiff's complaint, Superintendent Lingenfelter left him a
voicemail message explaining that law enforcement contacts with him were justified based on
laints where the plaintiff matched the reporting parties' descriptions ofthe suspect.
_-li--?'"
e.
6
7
County jail after his arrest on June 24, 2009.
8
9
10
f.
plaintiff complained of any wrist injury or pain after his arrest on June 24, 2009.
g.
The plaintiff did not have any visible injury to his hands or wrists when he was
evaluated by a nurse at the County jail after his arrest on June 24, 2009.
13
14
The nurse who evaluated the plaintiff at the County jail examined the plaintiff's
hands and wrists and did not note any injury to the plaintiff in any manner, and did not note the
11
12
The plaintiff did not complain of any wrist injury or pain to the intake officer at the
h.
The only physical injury the plaintiff claims in this lawsuit is injury to his right wrist
from allegedly being kicked, and pain caused by handcuffing after his arrest on June 24,2009.
15
Exhibits Stipulated to Be Admissible at Trial
16
a.
Time sheets for Ronald Callison and Dan Kraft.
17
b.
Certified copy of Santa Cruz County 91 I-Emergency Dispatch Report, from
18
emergency call by Greg Inloes on June 22, 2009.
19
c.
20
June 24, 2009.
21
d.
22
Certified copy of Santa Cruz County Jail booking sheet for Adams's jail intake on
Santa Cruz County Jail Intake Health Screening form for the jail intake of Berry
Adams, on June 24, 2009.
23
e.
Santa Cruz County Jail Nurse Intake Evaluation form for Berry Adams, on June 24,
25
f.
Rescinded citation for alcohol possession dated "2/15/07," number 647696.
26
g.
Adams' complaint letter to Lingenfelter.
27
h.
Lingenfelter letter to D.A. requesting a stay away order for Adams.
28
i.
Lingenfelter letter to Adams re: Adams' complaints.
24
2009.
2
Stipulation and Order re: Facts and Exhibits (5:IO-CV-00602 LHK)
Case5:10-cv-00602-LHK Document231 Filed05/07/12 Page3 of 4
j.
Video ofincident on June 24,2009.
2
k.
Tape recording of Adams' arrest after he was placed in police car.
3
1.
Video of interview with Fox News on June 22, 2009.
4
m. Nine-page hand written account from Inloes.
5
n.
Inloes letter stating that the written account was solicited from the Rangers.
6
o.
Kniveslblades.
7
8
-The Buck knife with a 3.5" blade Adams wore on the right side of his belt, on the
afternoon of June 24, 2009 when Officer Hauck first made contact with him.
9
10
-The Gerber utility tool with a 3" blade Adams wore on the left side of your belt, on
the afternoon of June 24,2009, when Officer Hauck first made contact with him.
p.
11
12
Defendants on June 24,2009, at approximately 12:30 p.m.
13
14
q.
Transcription of second audio recording of statements made by witness Inloes to
Defendants on June 24,2009, at approximately 2:06 p.m.
r.
15
16
Transcription of first audio recording of statements made by witness Inloes to
Transcription of audio recording of statements made by Adams to Defendants on June
24, 2009, after his arrest.
17
s.
Compact disc of audio records of previous three recordings.
18
t.
Adams's written response to Special Interrogatories from Kraft, Hauck and Best.
19
u.
Adams's response to Request for Production of Documents from Kraft, Hauck and
20
Best, and the documents produced.
v.
Transcript of conversation between defendant Kraft and plaintiff Adams on June 25,
23
w.
Excerpts from POST Leaming Domain 20.
24
x.
Excerpts from POST Learning Domain 33.
25
y.
Criminal complaint, Case No. M49450.
21
22
2009.
26
11/
27
/11
28
3
Stipulation and Order re: Facts and Exhibits (S:1D-CV-00602 LHK)
Case5:10-cv-00602-LHK Document231 Filed05/07/12 Page4 of 4
1
z.
Public Safety Report 292016706.
2
aa.
Public Safety Report 292012642.
3
bb.
Supplemental Report 292012624
4
5
Dated: May 4,2012
Respectfully Submitted,
6
KAMALA D. HARRIS
7
JOHN P. DEVINE
Attorney General of California
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
8
lsi
=D-AN-I-EL~B~.~A~LWE-I-SS------------
9
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneysfor Defendants Kraft, Hauck and Best
10
11
12
Dated: May 4,2012
13
Respectfully Submitted,
LA W OFFICE OF KATE WELLS
14
lsi
KA=-TE---;"W=E--L-L-'S
15
-----------
Attorneyfor PlaintiffBerry Lynn Adams
16
ORDER
17
18
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the facts stated above are
19
deemed established in this action, and the jurors must accept them as true. IT IS FURTHER
20
ORDERED that the exhibits listed above are admissible at trial.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 8, 2012
Dated: ------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
4
Stipulation and Order re: Facts and Exhibits (5:1O-CV-00602 LHK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?