Hibnick v. Google Inc.
Filing
136
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/17/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)
9
10
S
ER
H
8
R NIA
Michael F. Ram (SBN 104805)
mram@ramolson.com
RAM & OLSON LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
RT
7
re
mes Wa
Judge Ja
NO
6
FO
5
LI
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
Gary E. Mason (pro hac vice)
gmason@masonlawdc.com
Donna F. Solen (pro hac vice)
dsolen@masonlawdc.com
MASON LLP
1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 429-2290
Facsimile: (202) 429-2294
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
11
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
No.: 10-00672 JW
15
IN RE GOOGLE BUZZ USER PRIVACY
LITIGATION
16
This Document Relates To:
ALL CASES
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT
OF EXPENSES
17
18
JUDGE:
Hon. James Ware
MEDIATOR: Hon. Fern Smith (Ret.)
19
Original Complaint Filed: 02/17/10
20
21
22
Having considered Class Counsel’s Final Application for Reimbursement of Expenses, the
23
Court herby ORDERS that the Claims Administrator shall make payment from the Settlement Fund
24
as follows:
25
1. Payment of $44,233.78 to Class Counsel;
26
2. Payment of $62,777.44 to The Garden City Group; and
27
3. Payment of $50,000.00 to The Rose Foundation.
28
–1–
Case No. 10-0672 JW –[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR
ATTORNEYS’FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
DATED: June 17, 2011
__________________________
The Honorable James Ware
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
Case No. 10-0672 JW –[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR
ATTORNEYS’FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?