Hibnick v. Google Inc.

Filing 136

ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/17/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

Download PDF
9 10 S ER H 8 R NIA Michael F. Ram (SBN 104805) mram@ramolson.com RAM & OLSON LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 RT 7 re mes Wa Judge Ja NO 6 FO 5 LI 4 DERED O OR IT IS S A 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 2 Gary E. Mason (pro hac vice) gmason@masonlawdc.com Donna F. Solen (pro hac vice) dsolen@masonlawdc.com MASON LLP 1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 429-2290 Facsimile: (202) 429-2294 UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 11 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 No.: 10-00672 JW 15 IN RE GOOGLE BUZZ USER PRIVACY LITIGATION 16 This Document Relates To: ALL CASES [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 17 18 JUDGE: Hon. James Ware MEDIATOR: Hon. Fern Smith (Ret.) 19 Original Complaint Filed: 02/17/10 20 21 22 Having considered Class Counsel’s Final Application for Reimbursement of Expenses, the 23 Court herby ORDERS that the Claims Administrator shall make payment from the Settlement Fund 24 as follows: 25 1. Payment of $44,233.78 to Class Counsel; 26 2. Payment of $62,777.44 to The Garden City Group; and 27 3. Payment of $50,000.00 to The Rose Foundation. 28 –1– Case No. 10-0672 JW –[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 DATED: June 17, 2011 __________________________ The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– Case No. 10-0672 JW –[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?