Hibnick v. Google Inc.

Filing 25

Proposed Order by Rochelle Williams. (Terrell, Reginald) (Filed on 6/13/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

AMAMGBO & ASSOCIATES DONALD AMAMGBO, ESQ. 7901 Oakport Street, Suite 4900 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 510-615-6025 Email: [e-mail] REGINALD TERRELL THE TERRELL LAW GROUP 223 25th Street Richmond, CA 94804 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 510-237-4616 Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ROCHELLE WILLIAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVA HIBNICK and ANDRANIK SOUVALIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, __ v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. This document relates to: ROCHELLE WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. Defendants._________ ___________

Case No.: C10-00672 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES

Case No.: C10-cv-02509 PVT

1

[PROPOSE] ORDER RE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

On June 11, 2010, Plaintiff in Williams v. Google, Inc.. et al., Case No. C10-02509 PVT, filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, pursuant to Local Rule 3-12. The Court, having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, HEREBY GRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Williams v. Google, Inc.. et al., Case No. C10-02509 PVT is hereby related to Hibnick v. Google, Inc., Case No.: 10-CV-00672 JW. Williams v. Google, Inc.. et al., Case No. C10-02509 PVT shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge pursuant to local Rule 3-12(f). Dated: ___________________________________ The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge

[PROPOSE] ORDER RE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED