Rodrigurz v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond re 27 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/29/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)

1 John Burton, State Bar No. 86029 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON 2 65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 300 Pasadena, California 91103 3 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Francisco and Bellerminda Rodriguez, Individually and as 6 Successors in Interest of Edwin Rodriguez, Deceased 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Counsel for all parties have been in contact with one another since the filing of the v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DEPUTY SHERIFFS JENSEN #1756, PALINOV #1864, CLARK #1676, and FERNANDES #2013, CITY OF CAMPBELL, CAMPBELL POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER GARY BERG #63, and DOES 1 to 20, Defendants. FRANCISCO and BELLERMINDA RODRIGUEZ, Individually and as Successors in Interest of EDWIN RODRIGUEZ, Deceased, Plaintiffs, Case No. C 10-735 JW STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MEDIATION; ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

26 case and have informally exchanged information. All parties have either been served or 27 have agreed to waive service. 28
Rodriguez v. County of Santa Clara ­ Case No. C 10-735 JW STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MEDIATION

1

The parties have decided that an early mediation is appropriate in this case. A

2 mediation has been set for July 19, 2010 with Harris Weinberg, Esq., in San Francisco. 3 The parties have filed a stipulation to private ADR, with a proposed completion date of 4 July 20, 2010. The Court has entered an order thereon, and set a case management 5 conference on September 13, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. 6 Given the foregoing circumstances, the parties stipulate and agree, should the 7 Court deem it appropriate and convenient, that each defendant shall be deemed to have 8 been served or to have waived service. If the case resolves at the mediation, the parties 9 shall promptly notify the Court and request the setting of an appropriate date for 10 completion of the settlement and dismissal of the action. If the case does not resolve, 11 each defendant shall have until August 13, 2010 to file a response to the complaint. 12 Dated: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 29, 2010 Dated: _____________________

June 23, 2010

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON By: /S/ John Burton Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ Acting County Counsel By: /S/ Aryn Paige Harris, Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Sheriffs Jensen #1765, Palinov #1864, Clark #1676, and Fernandes #2013 MANNING & MARDER KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ LLP /S/ Eugene P. Ramirez Attorney for Defendants City of Campbell, Campbell Police Department, and OoliDe Officer Gary Berg #63 P R c ER ________________________ United States District Judge By:

Rodriguez v. County of Santa Clara ­ Case No. C 10-735 JW STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MEDIATION

-2-