Treglia v. Kate et al

Filing 99

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 95 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

DANIEL TREGLIA,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 10-0757 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
DISMISS
(Docket Nos. 95, 96)

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a seventh amended complaint under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file his opposition

19

to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to dismiss.

20

Because it appears no party would be prejudiced by an extension, Plaintiff’s motion is

21

GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before twenty (20) days from the date this

22

order is filed. Defendants shall file their reply no later than fifteen (15) days thereafter.

23

This order terminates docket nos. 95 and 96.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

DATED:

8/30/11
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

27
28
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss
P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.10\Treglia757eot-oppo.wpd