Treglia v. Kate et al

Filing 99

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 95 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL TREGLIA, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-0757 LHK (PR) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS (Docket Nos. 95, 96) 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a seventh amended complaint under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file his opposition 19 to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to dismiss. 20 Because it appears no party would be prejudiced by an extension, Plaintiff’s motion is 21 GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before twenty (20) days from the date this 22 order is filed. Defendants shall file their reply no later than fifteen (15) days thereafter. 23 This order terminates docket nos. 95 and 96. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 DATED: 8/30/11 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.10\Treglia757eot-oppo.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?