Hao v. Chen

Filing 115

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 114 Joint Stipulation/Motion to Dismiss.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Case5:10-cv-00826-LHK Document114 Filed12/18/12 Page1 of 3

1

5

CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
John D. Minton (Bar No. 223823)
David M. King (Bar No. 95279)
216 Park Road
Burlingame, California 94011
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, SHYH-YIH HAO

7

11

ROSSI, HAMERSLOUGH, REISCHL & CHUCK
Ronald R. Rossi, Esq. (Bar No. 43067)
Susan Reischl, Esq. (Bar No. 94037)
Dean C. Rossi, Esq. (Bar No. 188844)
1960 The Alameda #200
San Jose, CA 95126
Office: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant/Third Party Plaintiff,
WU-FU CHEN

13

16

FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN, LLP
Robert E. Freitas, Esq. (Bar No. 80948)
100 Marine Pkwy Ste 200
Redwood City, CA 94065
Office: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant, ELLEN HAO CHEN

2
3
4

8
9
10

14
15

18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN JOSE DIVISION
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

SHYH-YIH HAO,

Case No. CV10-00826 LHK (HRL)
Plaintiff,

v.

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

WU-FU CHEN, and
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive,
Defendant.
And Related Action.

28
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Case No. CV10-00826 LHK (HRL)

Case5:10-cv-00826-LHK Document114 Filed12/18/12 Page2 of 3

1

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant SHYH-YIH HAO, Defendant and

2

Counterclaimant/Third Party Plaintiff WU-FU CHEN, and Third Party Defendant, ELLEN HAO

3

CHEN (collectively the “Parties”), hereby file this Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice the

4

entire action captioned above, including the complaint and counterclaim on file herein, on the

5

basis that the Parties have resolved this entire matter. The Parties jointly move the Court to

6

dismiss this case with prejudice, the Parties to bear their own expenses and attorneys’ fees.

7

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that their Joint Motion to Dismiss with

8

Prejudice be granted.

9

Dated: December 18, 2012 CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation

10
11

By:

12
13

/s/
John D. Minton
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
SHYH-YIH HAO

14
15

Dated: December 18, 2012 ROSSI HAMERSLOUGH REISCHL

16
By:

17
18
19

/s/
Dean C. Rossi
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant/Third
Party Plaintiff
WU-FU CHEN

20
21

Dated: December 18, 2012 FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN, LLP

22
By:

23
24

/s/
Robert E. Freitas
Attorneys for Third Party Defendant
ELLEN HAO CHEN

25
26
27

///
///

28
2

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Case No. CV10-00826 LHK (HRL)

Case5:10-cv-00826-LHK Document114 Filed12/18/12 Page3 of 3

1

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I attest that concurrence in the filing of

2

this document has been obtained from its signatories.

3

Dated: December 18, 2012
/s/
John D. Minton

4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER

6
7

For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders that this

8

entire action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his or her own expenses and

9

attorneys’ fees. The Clerk shall close the file.

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated: December 28, 2012
_____________________

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

13
14
15

29540-00001\iManage\4314702.1

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Case No. CV10-00826 LHK (HRL)