San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. The Glad Products Company et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT MCNEIL-PPC, INC.'S TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT re 25 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/26/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RICHARD B. GOETZ (State Bar No. 115666) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] ROBERTA H. VESPREMI (State Bar No. 225067) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant MCNEIL-PPC, INC. KATHRYN G. SPELMAN (State Bar No. 154512) DANIEL H. FINGERMAN (State Bar No. 229683) MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 333 West San Carlos Street San Jose, California 95110 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff, v. THE GLAD PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al. Defendants.

Case No. 5:10-cv-00966-JF -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT MCNEIL-PPC, INC.'S TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff San Francisco Technology Inc. ("plaintiff") and defendant McNeil-PPC, Inc. ("defendant"), by and through their counsel of record as follows: WHEREAS plaintiff filed its Complaint on March 5, 2010, and defendant was served on March 18, 2010; WHEREAS the current deadline for defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is April 7, 2010; WHEREAS defendant has not previously sought to extend its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS because defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately investigate the pertinent facts and applicable law, and to determine how to appropriately respond to the Complaint, the plaintiff and defendant respectfully request the Court to extend the defendant's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 14, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate as follows: Defendant's last day to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is May 14, 2010. SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 24, 2010 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

/s/ ______ __ Vespremi By: _______Roberta_H. ___________________ Roberta H. Vespremi Attorneys for Defendant MCNEIL-PPC, INC. Dated: March 24, 2010 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C.

/ _ Daniel H. _________ By: ______s/_________Fingerman __________ Daniel H. Fingerman Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MP1:1191666.1

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for plaintiff, Daniel H. Fingerman.

Dated: March 24, 2010

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: ______/s/ __________Vespremi _________ __ Roberta H. ________ Roberta H. Vespremi Attorneys for Defendant MCNEIL-PPC, INC.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: March ____, 2010 ______________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel United States District Judge

-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Certificate of Service The undersigned certifies that on March 24, 2010, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, using the court's electronic filing system (ECF), in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-4 and General Order 45. The ECF system serves a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to all parties and counsel who have appeared in this action, who have consented under Civil L.R. 5-5 and General Order 45 to accept that Notice as service of this document. Date: March 24, 2010 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

/s/ ______ __ Vespremi By: _______Roberta_H. ___________________ Roberta H. Vespremi Attorneys for Defendant MCNEIL-PPC, INC.

-4STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF