Reflex Packaging Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Modification of Patent Scheduling Order re 23 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/22/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)

Download PDF
Reflex Packaging Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Doc. 24 1 MICHAEL M. CARLSON (CSBN 88048) 2 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 3 San Francisco, California 94104-5501 4 Telephone: 415-364-6700 Facsimile: 415-364-6785 Attorneys for Plaintiff One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200 E-Mail: MCarlson@Schnader.com 5 6 REFLEX PACKAGING, INC. 7 8 RUSSELL B. HILL, Cal. Bar No. 190070 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993 714-513-5100 Facsimile: 714-513-5130 11 rhill@sheppardmullin.co m mblake@sheppardmullin.co m SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP MARK L. BLAKE, Cal. Bar No. 253511 9 650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor 10 Telephone: 12 13 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PHDATA 3313679_1 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REFLEX PACKAGING, INC., Plaint iff, v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. Defendant. Case No. 5:10-cv-01002-JW JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER The Hon. James Ware [Complaint Filed: March 9, 2010] -1- JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, 2 JOINTLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING: 3 4 2010. 5 6 I. BACKGROUND This request is made to accommodate pre-planned vacations of counsel of record for the A modification of certain deadlines set in the Patent Scheduling Order, dated June 3, 7 parties. These plans existed before the Patent Scheduling Order was entered on June 3. 2010. The 8 deadlines in the Order were set without an appearance by counsel. The changes proposed below 9 do not affect any court hearing dates set in the Patent Scheduling Order. 10 11 II. PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CASE SCHDULE The parties propose modifying the case schedule as follows; all other provisions of the 12 Patent Scheduling Order would remain unchanged: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PHDATA 3313679_1 Current date 07/16/2010 07/26/2010 Proposed date 07/30/2010 08/02/2010 Event Lenovo's Invalidity Contentions due (Patent L.R. 3-3) Each party to serve Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction. (Patent L.R. 4-1; Scheduling Order 4.) Parties to simultaneously exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence. (Patent L.R. 42; Scheduling Order 5.) Parties to file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3; Scheduling Order at page 1, lines 26-27.) ). Close of Claim Construction Discovery (Patent L.R. 44) Joint Case Management Statement for Interim Case Management Conference Interim Case Management Conference 08/16/2010 08/30/2010 09/17/2010 09/24/2010 10/22/2010 10/22/2010 11/1/2010 No change No change No change -2- JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 5 Dated: July 16, 2010 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Date: ____Ju_y 22,______________ _ l ___ 2010 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PHDATA 3313679_1 02/04/2011 at 9 am No change Case Tutorial & Claim Construction Hearing By: /s/ Michael M. Carlson MICHAEL M. CARLSON Attorneys for Plaintiff REFLEX PACKAGING, INC. Dated: July 16, 2010 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By: /s/ Russell B. Hill RUSSELL B. HILL Attorneys for Defendant LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Hon. James Ware UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -3- JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?