Reflex Packaging Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Modification of Patent Scheduling Order re 23 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/22/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)

Reflex Packaging Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.

Doc. 24

1 MICHAEL M. CARLSON (CSBN 88048) 2 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 3 San Francisco, California 94104-5501 4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-364-6785 Attorneys for Plaintiff One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200 E-Mail: [e-mail]

5 6 REFLEX PACKAGING, INC. 7 8 RUSSELL B. HILL, Cal. Bar No. 190070
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993 714-513-5100 Facsimile: 714-513-5130 11 [e-mail] m [e-mail] m SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP MARK L. BLAKE, Cal. Bar No. 253511

9 650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor

10 Telephone: 12

13 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PHDATA 3313679_1

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REFLEX PACKAGING, INC., Plaint iff, v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. Defendant.

Case No. 5:10-cv-01002-JW JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER The Hon. James Ware [Complaint Filed: March 9, 2010]

-1-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1

THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD,

2 JOINTLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING: 3 4 2010. 5 6
I. BACKGROUND This request is made to accommodate pre-planned vacations of counsel of record for the A modification of certain deadlines set in the Patent Scheduling Order, dated June 3,

7 parties. These plans existed before the Patent Scheduling Order was entered on June 3. 2010. The 8 deadlines in the Order were set without an appearance by counsel. The changes proposed below 9 do not affect any court hearing dates set in the Patent Scheduling Order. 10 11
II. PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CASE SCHDULE The parties propose modifying the case schedule as follows; all other provisions of the

12 Patent Scheduling Order would remain unchanged: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PHDATA 3313679_1

Current date 07/16/2010 07/26/2010

Proposed date 07/30/2010 08/02/2010

Event Lenovo's Invalidity Contentions due (Patent L.R. 3-3) Each party to serve Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction. (Patent L.R. 4-1; Scheduling Order ¶ 4.) Parties to simultaneously exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence. (Patent L.R. 42; Scheduling Order ¶ 5.) Parties to file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3; Scheduling Order at page 1, lines 26-27.) ). Close of Claim Construction Discovery (Patent L.R. 44) Joint Case Management Statement for Interim Case Management Conference Interim Case Management Conference

08/16/2010

08/30/2010

09/17/2010

09/24/2010

10/22/2010 10/22/2010 11/1/2010

No change No change No change

-2-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 2 3 4 IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 5 Dated: July 16, 2010 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Date: ____Ju_y 22,______________ _ l ___ 2010 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PHDATA 3313679_1

02/04/2011 at 9 am

No change

Case Tutorial & Claim Construction Hearing

By:

/s/ Michael M. Carlson MICHAEL M. CARLSON Attorneys for Plaintiff REFLEX PACKAGING, INC.

Dated: July 16, 2010

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

By:

/s/ Russell B. Hill RUSSELL B. HILL Attorneys for Defendant LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. James Ware UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-3-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER