Reflex Packaging Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Filing
64
INTERIM ORDER re 57 Discovery Dispute Joint Report #1. Parties to comply within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/25/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: January 25, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
No. C10-01002 EJD (HRL)
REFLEX PACKAGING,
INTERIM ORDER RE DISCOVERY
DISPUTE JOINT REPORT #1
Plaintiff,
v.
LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC.
15
Defendant.
/
16
17
Having reviewed the parties’ Discovery Dispute Joint Report (DDJR) #1, as well as the
18
declaration of Brian Jesinskey filed concurrently by defendant, the court issues this interim
19
order:
20
1.
Each party shall advise the court whether or not In re Citric Acid Litigation, 191
21
F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 1999) states the current law in the Ninth Circuit on interpretation of the
22
word “control” for purposes of production of documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34.
23
2.
Plaintiff may submit its evidence in support of its argument in the DDJR.
24
3.
Lenovo (United States) shall submit evidence to close two gaps in the Jesinskey
25
26
declaration:
a.
Were any of the current or past officers, directors, or employees of
27
Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo Singapore, Lenovo Hong Kong, or Lenovo Beijing ever officers,
28
directors, or employees of Lenovo (United States)? If so, give specific information, including
1
dates.
2
b.
Does Lenovo (United States) share or have access to any databases with
3
Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo Singapore, Lenovo Hong Kong, or Lenovo Beijing? If so, describe
4
full particulars, with special attention to whether any such database includes information of the
5
kind sought by plaintiff (and, if so, whether it has been produced).
6
4.
7
SO ORDERED.
8
The parties shall comply within 14 days from the date of this order.
Dated: January 25, 2012
9
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5:10-cv-01002-EJD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Gregory Paul Barbee
3
Mark L. Blake
4
Michael M. Carlson
5
Russell B. Hill
6
Steven Mark Hanle
7
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
gbarbee@sheppardmullin.com, snavarro@sheppardmullin.com
mblake@sheppardmullin.com
mcarlson@schnader.com, mpadilla@schnader.com
rhill@smrh.com, mblake@smrh.com, tcontreras@smrh.com
shanle@sheppardmullin.com, jfrancis@sheppardmullin.com
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?