Cardoza v. Genmor Plumbing, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 18 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 08/18/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2010)

Cardoza v. Genmor Plumbing, Inc. et al

Doc. 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

JAMES DAL BON, Bar No. 157942 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 DAL BON & MARGAIN, APC 28 NORTH 1ST SUITE 210 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ROGER M. MASON, ESQ. (107486) CAITLIN E. KAUFMAN, ESQ. (238424) SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON & BOSOMWORTH 983 University Avenue, Suite 104C Los Gatos, CA 95032-7637 408-356-3000 phone [phone] fax [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants

** E-filed August 18, 2010 **

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASMIN CARDOZA Plaintiff v. GENMOR PLUMBING, INC. and GENARO Case No.: C 10-01021 HRL STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE WITH COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

20

DELGADILLO MORALES
21

Defendant(s)
22 23 24 25

Plaintiff JASMIN CARDOZA and Defendants GENMOR PLUMBING, INC. and GENARO DELGADILLO MORALES (collectively, "Defendants") through their attorneys of record hereby submit the following stipulation.
1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1.

The parties have executed a written settlement agreement which disposes of all claims in this matter;

2. 3.

The settlement agreement calls for consideration to be paid over time. The parties desire to have this matter dismissed with prejudice but to have the Court exercise jurisdiction over the settlement until October 1, 2011.

Dated: August 17, 2010

Caitlin E. Kaufman SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON & BOSOMWORTH By: //s// Caitlin E. Kaufman Caitlin E. Kaufman Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: August 17, 2010
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

By:

Tomas Margain DAL BON & MARGAIN, APC //s// Tomas Margain Tomas Margain Attorneys for Plaintiff

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION

ORDER
1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY
2

ORDERED that this case be Dismissed with prejudice. However, the Court retains jurisdiction
3

of this matter only for the purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement if one party asserts a
4

breach of the agreement. This retention of jurisdiction will last until October 1, 2011 only.
5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ORDERED.

19 Dated: August ____ 2010 Judge Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION