Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. Williams et al

Filing 46

Declaration of David K. Caplan in Support of 45 Sixth MOTION to Continue or Vacate Case Management Conference; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed byZynga Game Network, Inc.. (Related document(s) 45 ) (Caplan, David) (Filed on 5/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668) E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407) E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174) E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com Tara D. Rose (Bar No. 256079) E-Mail: trose@kmwlaw.com KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP 9720 Wilshire Boulevard Penthouse Suite Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 248-3830 Facsimile: (310) 860-0363 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., a Delaware Corporation, 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JASON WILLIAMS, an individual, LUNA MARTINI, an individual, WAN-WEN KUO, an individual, and JOHN DOES 4-5 D/B/A MW GROUP Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 I, David K. Caplan, declare as follows: 1. I am a partner of the firm Keats McFarland & Wilson LLP, counsel to Zynga Inc. 3 (“Zynga”) in this matter. I am over the age of eighteen and am competent to testify. Unless 4 otherwise stated herein, I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration, and if 5 called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto. 6 2. Because the defendants have not participated in the litigation, Zynga has been unable 7 to conduct the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Federal Rule”) 26(f)(1). 8 Accordingly, Zynga will be unable to file the joint case management statement required by Federal 9 Rule 26(f)(2) and Civil Local Rule 16-9. 10 11 3. One of the defendants (Wan Wen-Kuo) is located overseas, and none of the Defendants have participated in this litigation in any way since being served with process. 12 4. Default has been entered against all Defendants. 13 5. Zynga is unable to submit the instant motion as a stipulation because the Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 have not participated in the litigation. 6. The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from June 8, 2010 to August 27, 2010. 7. The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from August 27, 2010 to November 5, 2010. 8. The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from November 5, 2010 to January 14, 2011. 9. The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from January 14, 2011 to April 15, 2011. 10. The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from April 15, 2011 to May 13, 2011. 25 26 27 28 -1CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 11. The requested continuance will not affect the schedule for this case other than the 2 Case Management Conference because the Court has not yet issued a scheduling order pursuant to 3 Rule 16(b). 4 5 6 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. 7 8 Executed this 6th day of May, 2011 at Natick, Massachusetts. 9 10 _______/s/_________________________ David K. Caplan 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?