Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. Williams et al
Filing
46
Declaration of David K. Caplan in Support of 45 Sixth MOTION to Continue or Vacate Case Management Conference; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed byZynga Game Network, Inc.. (Related document(s) 45 ) (Caplan, David) (Filed on 5/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668)
E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com
Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407)
E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com
David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174)
E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com
Tara D. Rose (Bar No. 256079)
E-Mail: trose@kmwlaw.com
KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP
9720 Wilshire Boulevard
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 248-3830
Facsimile: (310) 860-0363
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
16
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx)
DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN
SUPPORT OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION
TO CONTINUE OR VACATE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
JASON WILLIAMS, an individual, LUNA
MARTINI, an individual, WAN-WEN KUO, an
individual, and JOHN DOES 4-5 D/B/A MW
GROUP
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx)
DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT
OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR
VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
I, David K. Caplan, declare as follows:
1.
I am a partner of the firm Keats McFarland & Wilson LLP, counsel to Zynga Inc.
3
(“Zynga”) in this matter. I am over the age of eighteen and am competent to testify. Unless
4
otherwise stated herein, I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration, and if
5
called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto.
6
2.
Because the defendants have not participated in the litigation, Zynga has been unable
7
to conduct the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Federal Rule”) 26(f)(1).
8
Accordingly, Zynga will be unable to file the joint case management statement required by Federal
9
Rule 26(f)(2) and Civil Local Rule 16-9.
10
11
3.
One of the defendants (Wan Wen-Kuo) is located overseas, and none of the
Defendants have participated in this litigation in any way since being served with process.
12
4.
Default has been entered against all Defendants.
13
5.
Zynga is unable to submit the instant motion as a stipulation because the Defendants
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
have not participated in the litigation.
6.
The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from
June 8, 2010 to August 27, 2010.
7.
The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from
August 27, 2010 to November 5, 2010.
8.
The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from
November 5, 2010 to January 14, 2011.
9.
The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from
January 14, 2011 to April 15, 2011.
10.
The Court previously continued the Case Management Conference in this case from
April 15, 2011 to May 13, 2011.
25
26
27
28
-1CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx)
DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT
OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR
VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
11.
The requested continuance will not affect the schedule for this case other than the
2
Case Management Conference because the Court has not yet issued a scheduling order pursuant to
3
Rule 16(b).
4
5
6
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct.
7
8
Executed this 6th day of May, 2011 at Natick, Massachusetts.
9
10
_______/s/_________________________
David K. Caplan
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx)
DECLARATION OF DAVID K. CAPLAN IN SUPPORT
OF ZYNGA’S SIXTH MOTION TO CONTINUE OR
VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?