Shahrivar v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 Extending Time for Filing Defendants' Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 7/22/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 7/25/2010)

Download PDF
Shahrivar v. City of San Jose et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SHARONROSE CANNISTRACI, CSBN #121827 Cannistraci Law Firm 99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 925 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone Number: (408) 297-5400 Facsimile Number: (408) 297-5407 E-Mail Address: sharonrose@cannistracilaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (#93249) MICHAEL J. DODSON, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#159743) NKIA D. RICHARDSON, Deputy City Attorney (#193209) Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street San Josť, California 95113-1905 Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION FARID SHAHRIVAR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipality; RODNEY RAPSON, an individual; DAVID SYKES, an individual; HARRY FREITAS, an individual; KATHERINE JENSEN, an individual; DAVID PRINTY, an individual; DANNY TSAO, an individual; KATRINA ALLEN, an individual; DOUG BAKER, an individual; ALEX GURZA, an individual; SARAH NUNES, an individual; LES WHITE, an individual; ALLEN DEMERS, an individual; RAJIV DAS, an individual; ADAM STREMPEL, an individual; STEVE PAGAN, an individual; ANGELA CHEN, an individual; MARK DANAJ, an individual; ROBERT FABELA, an individual; SUSAN LACY, and DOES 1 through 45, inclusive, Defendants. Case Number: CV10-01029 PVT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING -1STIP AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE CASE NO.: CV10-01029 PVT 676653 Dockets.Justia.com 7/22/10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?