Gens v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
108
ORDER Setting Hearings. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/05/2013. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
LAURA GENS,
Plaintiff,
v.
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-01073-LHK
12-CV-05947-LHK
ORDER SETTING HEARINGS
On January 28, 2013, this Court related Gens v. Cal-Western Reconveyance et al., 12-CV-
17
05947-EJD, to the earlier filed Gens v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp. et al., 10-CV-01073-LHK. ECF
18
No. 39. At the time that Gens v. Cal-Western Reconveyance et al., 12-CV-05947-EJD, was
19
reassigned to this Court, Defendants had a pending Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 10, Motion for
20
Joinder, ECF No. 13, and Motion for Remand, ECF No. 14.
21
On February 1, 2013, the United States Bankruptcy Court imposed an automatic stay in the
22
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Plaintiff Laura Gens (“Plaintiff”), in the matter entitled In re Laura
23
Gens, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 13-50106-
24
ASW. See ECF NO. 103 (“Notice of Automatic Stay”). The “automatic stay” pursuant to 11
25
U.S.C. § 362 operated as an automatic stay of the continuation of a “judicial, administrative, or
26
other action or proceeding” against the debtor, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1), as well as an automatic stay
27
of acts to “collect, assess, or recover a claim” against the debtor arising prior to the application date
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-01073-LHK
12-CV-05947-LHK
ORDER SETTING HEARINGS
1
for the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(6). The automatic stay was to remain in effect until
2
April 15, 2013, pending a ruling on Plaintiff’s motion to impose the automatic stay. Notice of
3
Automatic Stay at 2. In light of this stay, the Court ordered the parties to file a joint status report
4
regarding the status of these federal court cases in light of Plaintiff’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case,
5
including whether any stay is currently in effect. See ECF No. 106.
6
On June 3, 2013, the parties filed their Joint Status Report pursuant to the Court’s Order.
See ECF No. 107. In this Joint Status Report, the parties state that the Honorable Arthur
8
Weissbrodt granted Plaintiff’s motion to impose the automatic stay and ordered the automatic stay
9
to be imposed for 6 months against creditor Wells Fargo (until October 10, 2013) to give Plaintiff
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
7
time to confirm or amend a Chapter 11 Plan in Plaintiff’s Bankruptcy. Id. at 2. Wells Fargo states
11
that it intends to re-file its motion for pre-bankruptcy attorney’s fees within 30 days of termination
12
of the automatic stay in Plaintiff’s Bankruptcy. Id. at 3. However, both parties agree that the
13
automatic stay does not prevent the continued prosecution of an action initiated by the debtor. ECF
14
No. 107 at 2 (citing In re Merrick, 175 B.R. 333, 337 (9th Cir. BAP 1994)); see also In re Mitchell,
15
206 B.R. 204, 212 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1997) (“The 11 U.S.C. § 362 automatic stay only stays
16
lawsuits against the debtor and the debtor’s bankruptcy estate.”). Accordingly, the Court hereby
17
sets a hearing on Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss, Defendants’ Motion for Joinder, and
18
Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand for July 11, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: June 5, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 10-CV-01073-LHK
12-CV-05947-LHK
ORDER SETTING HEARINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?