Ries et al v. Hornell Brewing Company, inc. et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 93 Stipulation filed by Ferolito Vultaggio & Sons, Inc., Beverage Marketing U.S.A, Inc, Hornell Brewing Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 8, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &
CARPENTER, LLP
ROBERT P. DONOVAN (pro hac vice)
rdonovan@mdmc-law.com
LEWIS H. GOLDFARB
(pro hac vice to be filed)
lgoldfarb@mdmc-law.com
Three Gateway Center
100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Telephone: (973) 622-7711
Facsimile: (973) 622-5314
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
SEDGWICK LLP
KEVIN J. DUNNE Bar No. 40030
kevin.dunne@sedgwicklaw.com
ANDREW J. KING Bar No. 253962
andrew.king@sedgwicklaw.com
One Market Plaza
Steuart Tower, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile: (415) 781-2635
BAKER LAW PC
G. RICHARD BAKER Bar No. 224003
richard@bakerlawpc.com
2229 First Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Telephone: (205) 241-9608
Facsimile: (205) 449-0050
JACKSON & TUCKER PC
JOSEPH L. TUCKER (pro hac vice)
josh@jacksonandtucker.com
2229 First Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Telephone: (205) 252-3535
Facsimile: (205) 252-3536
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER
(Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page)
Attorneys for Defendants
ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA LLC,
HORNELL BREWING CO., INC. d/b/a
FEROLITO, VULTAGGIO & SONS, INC.
and BEVERAGE MARKETING USA, INC.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
20
LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER,
Individuals on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA LLC,
HORNELL BREWING COMPANY, INC.,
BEVERAGE MARKETING USA, INC., and
FEROLITO, VULTAGGIO & SONS, INC.,
Defendants.
27
28
-1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
It appearing that discovery in the above-captioned action is likely to involve the
disclosure of confidential information, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Any party to this litigation and any third-party shall have the right to designate as
4
“Confidential” and subject to this Order any information, document, or thing, or portion of any
5
document or thing: (a) that contains trade secrets, competitively sensitive technical, marketing,
6
financial, sales or other confidential business information, or (b) that contains private or
7
confidential personal information, or (c) that contains information received in confidence from
8
third parties, or (d) which the producing party otherwise believes in good faith to be entitled to
9
protection under Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any party to this
10
litigation or any third party covered by this Order, who produces or discloses any confidential
11
material, including without limitation any information, document, thing, interrogatory answer,
12
admission, pleading, or testimony, shall mark the same with the foregoing or similar legend:
13
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
14
(hereinafter “ Confidential Material”).
15
2.
Any party to this litigation and any third-party shall have the right to designate as
16
“CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” and subject to this Order any information,
17
document, or thing, or portion of any document or thing that contains extremely sensitive
18
19
business or personal information, the disclosure of which is extremely likely to cause significant
consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1).
harm to an individual or to the business or competitive position of the designating party, . Any
20
party to this litigation or any third party who is covered by this Order, who produces or discloses
21
any Attorneys’ Eyes Only material, including without limitation any information, document,
22
thing, interrogatory answer, admission, pleading, or testimony, shall mark the same with the
23
foregoing or similar legend: “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
24
“CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
25
(hereinafter “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material”).
26
3.
All Confidential Material shall be used by the receiving party solely for purposes
27
of the prosecution or defense of this action, shall not be used by the receiving party for any
28
business, commercial, competitive, personal or other purpose, and shall not be disclosed by the
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
receiving party to anyone other than those set forth in Paragraph 4, unless and until the
2
restrictions herein are removed either by written agreement of counsel for the parties, or by Order
3
of the Court. It is, however, understood that counsel for a party may give advice and opinions to
4
his or her client solely relating to the above-captioned action based on his or her evaluation of
5
Confidential Material, provided that such advice and opinions shall not reveal the content of such
6
Confidential Material except by prior written agreement of counsel for the parties, or by Order of
7
the Court.
8
4.
9
Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following individuals under
the following conditions:
10
a.
11
Outside counsel (herein defined as any attorney at the
parties’ outside law firms) and relevant in-house counsel for the parties;
12
b.
Outside experts or consultants retained by outside counsel
13
for purposes of this action, provided they have signed a non-disclosure
14
agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A;
c.
15
Secretarial, paralegal, clerical, duplicating and data
processing personnel of the foregoing;
16
d.
17
Any deponent may be shown or examined on any
18
information, document or thing designated Confidential if it appears that
19
the witness authored or received a copy of it, was involved in the subject
20
matter described therein or is employed by the party who produced the
21
information, document or thing, or if the producing party consents to such
22
disclosure;
e.
23
Vendors retained by or for the parties to assist in preparing
24
for pretrial discovery, trial and/or hearings including, but not limited to,
25
court reporters, litigation support personnel, jury consultants, individuals
26
to prepare demonstrative and audiovisual aids for use in the courtroom or
27
in depositions or mock jury sessions, as well as their staff, stenographic,
28
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
and clerical employees whose duties and responsibilities require access to
2
such materials; and
3
f.
The parties. In the case of parties that are corporations or
4
other business entities, “party” shall mean executives who are required to
5
participate in decisions with reference to this lawsuit.
6
5.
Confidential Material shall be used only by individuals permitted access to it
7
under Paragraph 4. Such Confidential Material, copies thereof, and the information contained
8
therein, shall not be disclosed in any manner to any other individual, until and unless (a) outside
9
counsel for the party asserting confidentiality waives the claim of confidentiality, or (b) the Court
10
11
orders such disclosure.
6.
With respect to any depositions that involve a disclosure of Confidential Material
12
of a party to this action, such party shall have until thirty (30) days after receipt of the deposition
13
transcript within which to inform all other parties that portions of the transcript are to be
14
designated Confidential, which period may be extended by agreement of the parties. No such
15
deposition transcript shall be disclosed to any individual other than the individuals described in
16
Paragraph 4(a), (b), (c), (e) and (f) above and the deponent during these thirty (30) days, and no
17
individual attending such a deposition shall disclose the contents of the deposition to any
18
individual other than those described in Paragraph 4(a), (b), (c), (e) and (f) above during said
19
thirty (30) days. Upon being informed that certain portions of a deposition are to be designated
20
as Confidential, all parties shall immediately cause each copy of the transcript in its custody or
21
control to be appropriately marked and limit disclosure of that transcript in accordance with
22
Paragraphs 3 and 4.
23
7.
Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material may be used by the receiving party solely for
24
purposes of the prosecution or defense of this action and shall not be used by the receiving party
25
for any business, commercial, competitive, personal or other purpose. Attorneys’ Eyes Only
26
Material may be disclosed only to outside counsel for the receiving party and to such other
27
persons as counsel for the producing party agrees in advance or as ordered by the Court.
28
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
8.
If counsel for a party receiving documents or information designated as
2
Confidential Material or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only hereunder objects to such
3
designation of any or all of such items, the following procedure shall apply:
4
a.
Counsel for the objecting party shall serve on the
5
designating party or third party a written objection to such designation,
6
which shall identify the documents or information in question. Counsel
7
for the designating party or third party shall respond in writing to such
8
objection within ten (10) days, and shall state with particularity the
9
grounds for asserting that the document or information is Confidential or
10
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. If no timely written response is
11
made to the objection, the challenged designation will be deemed to be
12
void. If the designating party or nonparty makes a timely response to such
13
objection asserting the propriety of the designation, counsel shall then
14
confer in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute.
15
b.
If a dispute as to a Confidential or Confidential –
16
Attorneys’ Eyes Only designation of a document or item of information
17
cannot be resolved by agreement, the proponent of the designation being
18
challenged shall present the dispute to the Magistrate Judge assigned to
19
adjudicate discovery disputes. The document or information that is the
20
subject of the filing shall be treated as originally designated pending
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge
resolution of the dispute.
proceeding shall be on the designating party.
The party seeking to submit Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material to the
21
22
9.
23
Court will seek an order of this Court permitting that party to file materials under seal in
24
accordance with the applicable Federal rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules for the
25
Northern District of California, including Civil Local Rule 79-5.
26
10.
If the need arises during trial or at any hearing before the Court for any party to
27
disclose Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material, it may do so only after
28
giving notice to the producing party and as directed by the Court.
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
11.
To the extent consistent with applicable law, the inadvertent or unintentional
2
disclosure of Confidential Material or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material that should have been
3
designated as such, regardless of whether the information, document or thing was so designated
4
at the time of disclosure, shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a party’s claim of
5
confidentiality, either as to the specific information, document or thing disclosed or as to any
6
other material or information concerning the same or related subject matter. Such inadvertent or
7
unintentional disclosure may be rectified by notifying in writing counsel for all parties to whom
8
the material was disclosed that the material should have been designated Confidential or
9
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only within a reasonable time after disclosure. Such notice shall
10
constitute a designation of the information, document or thing as Confidential Material or
11
Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material under this Order.
12
12.
When the inadvertent or mistaken disclosure of any information, document or
13
thing protected by privilege or work-product immunity is discovered by the producing party and
14
brought to the attention of the receiving party, the receiving party’s treatment of such material
15
shall be in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). Such inadvertent or
16
mistaken disclosure of such information, document or thing shall not by itself constitute a waiver
17
by the producing party of any claims of privilege or work-product immunity. However, nothing
18
herein restricts the right of the receiving party to challenge the producing party’s claim of
19
privilege if appropriate within a reasonable time after receiving notice of the inadvertent or
20
mistaken disclosure.
21
13.
No information that is in the public domain or which is already known by the
22
receiving party through proper means or which is or becomes available to a party from a source
23
other than the party asserting confidentiality, rightfully in possession of such information on a
24
nonconfidential basis, shall be deemed or considered to be Confidential Material or Attorneys’
25
Eyes Only Material under this Order.
26
14.
This Order shall not deprive any party of its right to object to discovery by any
27
other party or on any otherwise permitted ground. This Order is being entered without prejudice
28
to the right of any party to move the Court for modification or for relief from any of its terms.
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
15.
This Order shall survive the termination of this action and shall remain in full
2
force and effect unless modified by an Order of this Court or by the written stipulation of the
3
parties filed with the Court.
4
16.
Upon final conclusion of this litigation, each party or other individual subject to
5
the terms hereof shall be under an obligation to certify, under oath, that they have either returned
6
to opposing counsel or destroyed all originals and unmarked copies of documents and things
7
containing Confidential Material and Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material and to destroy, should such
8
source so request, all copies of Confidential Material and Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material that
9
contain and/or constitute attorney work product as well as excerpts, summaries and digests
10
revealing Confidential Material and Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information; provided, however, that
11
counsel may retain complete copies of all transcripts and pleadings including any exhibits
12
attached thereto for archival purposes, subject to the provisions of this Consent Confidentiality
13
Order.
14
17.
This Order may be modified by agreement of the parties, subject to Court
15
approval. In addition, the provisions of this Protective Order may be modified by this Court, for
16
good cause, or in the interest of justice, or in its own order at any time in these proceedings. The
17
within order and parties’ stipulation do not change, amend or circumvent any court rule or local
18
rule.
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
21
DATED: August 23, 2011
JACKSON & TUCKER PC
22
By: /s/ Joseph L. “Josh” Tucker (with permission)
Joseph L. Tucker (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER
23
24
25
BAKER LAW PC
G. Richard Baker (Bar No. 224003)
2229 First Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Telephone: (205) 241-9608
Facsimile: (205) 449-0050
26
27
28
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.
Kevin P. Roddy (Bar No. 128283)
Phillip A. Tortoreti (pro hac vice)
Daniel R. Lapinski (pro hac vice)
Suite 900 Box 10
Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095
Telephone: (732) 636-8000
Facsimile: (205) 449-0050
2
3
4
5
DL LAW GROUP
David D. Lilienstein (Bar No. 218923)
345 Franklin Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone (415) 271-7169
Facsimile (415) 358-8484
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LAUREN RIES and SERENA ALGOZER
10
11
12
DATED: August 23, 2011
McELROY DEUTSCH MULVANEY &
CARPENTER, LLP
13
/s/ Robert P. Donovan
Robert P. Donovan (Appearing pro hac vice)
14
SEDGWICK LLP
15
/s/ Andrew J. King
Andrew J. King (Bar No. 253962)
Kevin J. Dunne (Bar No. 40030)
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA LLC, HORNELL
BREWING COMPANY, INC., d/b/a FEROLITO,
VULTAGGIO & SONS, INC. and BEVERAGE
MARKETING USA, INC.
18
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
DATED: 9/8/2011
HONORABLE JEREMYPAUL S. GREWAL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOGEL, USDJ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
I,
, [print or type full name], of
4
[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have
5
read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United
6
States District Court for the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of Lauren Ries,
7
et al. v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, et al., Case No. 10-01139 (JF). I agree to comply with and
8
to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and
9
acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the
10
nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or
11
item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict
12
compliance with the provisions of this Order.
13
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
14
Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective
15
Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
I hereby appoint
16
[print or type full name] of
17
[print or type full address and telephone number] as my California
18
agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to
19
enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
20
21
Date:
22
City and State where sworn and signed:
23
Printed name:
24
Signature:
25
26
27
28
SF/2349809v1
#1640174
-9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. CV 10-01139 JF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?