McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 100

MOTION to Continue Hearing Date of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss filed by Mary McKinney. (Avila, Sara) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

MILSTEIN | ADELMAN, LLP
GILLIAN L. WADE, State Bar No. 229124
[e-mail]
SARA D. AVILA, State Bar No. 263213
[e-mail]
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, California 90405
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC
Joe R. Whatley, Jr. (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No.4406088)
[e-mail]
Edith M. Kallas (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 2200434)
[e-mail]
Patrick J. Sheehan (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 3016060)
[e-mail]
1540 Broadway, 37th Floor
New York, New York 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

5:10-cv-01177-EJD (Hon. Edward J. Davila)

MARY MCKINNEY, Individually and on )
)
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
)
and, HTC CORP., a Delaware corporation.
)
)
)
Defendants
)

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING THE
HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL.
L.R. 7-7(b)]
Current Hearing Date:
Proposed Hearing Date:

July 1, 2011
July 22, 2011

24
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(b), Plaintiff files this unopposed request for a
25
continuance of the hearing date on Defendants HTC Corporation (“HTC”) and Google Inc.’s
26
(“Google”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”).
27
WHEREAS, the hearing on the Motion is currently set for July 1, 2011;
28
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING
DATE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
5:10-CV-01177-EJD

1

1

WHEREAS, an opposition and reply to the Motion have been filed;

2

WHEREAS, the parties affected by the Motion have previously stipulated once to continue

3
4

the hearing date (see Docket No. 93);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests a continuance of the hearing date because, unless the

5

hearing is rescheduled, Plaintiff’s counsel must travel by airplane to San Jose from Boston and

6

Los Angeles during the busy Independence Day weekend to attend the hearing scheduled for the

7

Friday, July 1, 2011 hearing;

8

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is unavailable July 8, 2011;

9

WHEREAS, counsel for HTC Corporation is unavailable July 15, 2011;

10

WHEREAS, to accommodate Plaintiff’s request Google and HTC do not oppose

11

continuing the July 1, 2011 hearing date to July 22, 2011, or any date thereafter that is convenient

12

for the Court;

13
14

WHEREAS, this extension will alter a time frame set by the local rules of this Court and
therefore requires a Court order for such an extension;

15

Plaintiff, through her counsel of record, and subject to this Court’s approval, requests that

16

the July 1, 2011 hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be continued to July 22 at 9:00 am, or

17

any date thereafter that is convenient to the Court.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
5:10-CV-01177-EJD

2

1

DATED: June 23, 2011

MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP

2
By:

3
4

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MCKINNEY

5
6

/s/ Sara Avila
SARA AVILA

DATED: June 23, 2011

WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC

7
8

By:

9
10

/s/ Patrick Sheehan
PATRICK SHEEHAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MCKINNEY

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
5:10-CV-01177-EJD

3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

5:10-cv-01177-EJD (Hon. Edward J. Davila)

MARY MCKINNEY, Individually and on )
)
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation;
)
)
)
Defendants
)

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
THE HEARING DATE OF
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
Current Hearing Date:
Proposed Hearing Date:

July 1, 2011
July 22, 2011

17

[PROPOSED] ORDER

18

PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to

19

Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is continued to ___________________________.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Date:
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
5:10-CV-01177-EJD

4

CERTIFICATION
1
2

I, Sara D. Avila, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

3
4
5
6

DATED: June 23, 2011

Attorney for Plaintiff Mary McKinney and the
Proposed Class

7
8
9
10

By: /s/ Sara D. Avila
MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP
Gillian L. Wade
Sara D. Avila

11

WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC
Joe R. Whatley, Jr.
Edith M. Kallas
Patrick J. Sheehan

12
13

LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD
RUBINSTEIN
Howard Rubinstein
[e-mail]
914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tel: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

SMITH & VANTURE, LLP
Brian W. Smith
[e-mail]
1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
5:10-CV-01177-EJD

5