McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al
Filing
105
ORDER REQUIRING CASE STATUS STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THE CASES SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than September 9, 2011, the parties in both cases shall file a joint statement addressing whether the cases should be consolidated and, if so, proposing a schedule for nomination of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on August 30, 2011. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011) Modified text on 8/31/2011 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SAN JOSE DIVISION
MARY MCKINNEY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE, INC., ET AL,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )
)
NATHAN NABORS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
Case No.: 5:10-CV-01177 EJD
Case No.: 5:10-CV-03897 EJD
ORDER REQUIRING CASE STATUS
STATEMENT REGARDING
WHETHER THE CASES SHOULD BE
CONSOLIDATED
On October 8, 2010, Chief Judge Ware issued an order finding that these cases are related
22
within the meaning of Rule 3-12(a). The Order also required the parties to file a joint case
23
management statement no later than October 15, 2010 addressing whether the cases should be
24
consolidated and, if so, proposing a schedule for nomination of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel.
25
A review of the docket indicates that a statement addressing consolidation has not been filed.
26
27
28
Accordingly,
1
Case No.: 5:10-CV-01177 EJD, 5:10-CV-03897 EJD
ORDER REQUIRING CASE STATUS STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THE
CASES SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than September 9, 2011, the parties in both cases
2
shall file a joint statement addressing whether the cases should be consolidated and, if so,
3
proposing a schedule for nomination of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel.
4
Dated: August 30, 2011
5
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
6
7
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:10-CV-01177 EJD, 5:10-CV-03897 EJD
ORDER REQUIRING CASE STATUS STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THE
CASES SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?