McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 112

STIPULATION Regarding Response Deadline for Consolidated Amended Complaint by HTC Corp.. (Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 10/11/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (SBN 97147)
DECHERT LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94111-3513
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
STEVEN B. WEISBURD (SBN 171490)
DECHERT LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 2010
Austin, TX 78701-3901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

10
11

Additional Counsel Listed on Signature
Page

GILLIAN L. WADE (SBN 229124)
SARA D. AVILA (SBN 263213)
MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
JOE R. WHATLEY, JR. (pro hac vice)
EDITH M. KALLAS (pro hac vice)
PATRICK J. SHEEHAN (pro hac vice)
WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC
380 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail];
[e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13

Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18

In re Google Phone Litigation

CASE NO. 5:10-CV-01177-EJD
(Consolidated with No. 5:10-CV-03897 EJD)

19
STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE
DEADLINE FOR CONSOLIDATED
AMENDED COMPLAINT

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15397703.1

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE DEADLINE
FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-CV-01177 EJD

1

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2011, the Court issued an order consolidating cases

2

entitled McKinney vs. Google, Inc. et al. (Case No. 5:10-cv-01177 EJD), and Nabors vs. Google,

3

Inc. (Case No. 5:10-cv-03897 EJD), and ordered Plaintiffs to file a Consolidated Amended

4

Complaint by September 30, 2011;

5
6

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) in the
consolidated action on September 30, 2011;

7

WHEREAS, Defendant Google Inc. was a named defendant in both McKinney and

8

Nabors before consolidation of the cases, and, therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

9

Procedure 15(a)(3), must answer, move or otherwise respond to the CAC by October 14, 2011;

10

WHEREAS, Defendant HTC Corporation was a named defendant in McKinney

11

but not in Nabors, and, therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (a)(1)(A), must

12

answer, move or otherwise respond to the CAC by October 21, 2011;

13

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that the deadline for both Defendants

14

to answer, move or otherwise respond to the CAC should be the same and further agree that the

15

response deadline for both Defendants shall be set for October 24, 2011; and

16

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already

17

fixed by Court order, and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) does not require a Court order for such an

18

extension;

19
20

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants through their counsel of record
stipulate to the following:

21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) that the deadline for

22

Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint in

23

this action shall be and is hereby extended to October 24, 2011.

24
25
26
27
28
15397703.1

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE DEADLINE
FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-CV-01177 EJD

1

DATED: October 11, 2011

MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Sara D. Avila
Sara D. Avila
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

5
6

DATED: October 11, 2011

DECHERT LLP

7
By:

8
9
10

DATED: October 11, 2011

/s/ Steven B. Weisburd
Steven B. Weisburd
Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

11
12

By:

13
14

/s/ Rosemarie T. Ring
Rosemarie T. Ring
Attorneys for Defendant
HTC Corporation

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15397703.1

-2-

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE DEADLINE
FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-CV-01177 EJD

1

Additional counsel:

2

HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN 132418)
AVI BRAZ (SBN 241577)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
HTC Corporation

12
13
14
15
16

BRIAN W. SMITH
SMITH & VANTURE, LLP
1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17

20

HOWARD RUBINSTEIN
LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD RUBINSTEIN
914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20
Aspen, CO 81611
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18
19

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15397703.1

-3-

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE DEADLINE
FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-CV-01177 EJD