McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 119

STIPULATION to Extent the Deadline for Defendants to Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint by HTC Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rosemarie T. Ring, # 2 Proposed Order)(Ring, Rosemarie) (Filed on 11/11/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

GILLIAN L. WADE (SBN 229124)
SARA D. AVILA (SBN 263213)
MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mary McKinney and
Nathan Nabors
HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN 132418)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

STEVEN B.WEISBURD (No. 171490)
DECHERT LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 2010
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 512.394.3001
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (No. 97147)
DECHERT LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111-3513
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.262.4555
E-Mail: [e-mail]

15

ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

16

Attorneys for Defendant HTC Corporation

13
14

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN JOSE DIVISION

21
In re Google Phone Litigation
22
23

CASE NO. 5:10-CV-01177-EJD
(Consolidated with No. 5:10-CV-03897 EJD)
DECLARATION OF ROSEMARIE T.
RING IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEADLINE

24
25
26
27
28
12946794.1

DECLARATION OF ROSEMARIE T. RING
CASE NO. C 10-01177 EJD

1

I, ROSEMARIE T. RING, declare as follows:

2

1.

I am an attorney at the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, counsel to

3

defendant HTC Corporation in this action. The contents of this declaration are within my

4

personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.

5

2.

On November 9, 2011, Defendants Google, Inc. and HTC Corporation requested a

6

two-week extension of the deadline set by the local rules for Defendants to file a reply in support

7

of their Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint in order to fully respond to the

8

arguments raised in Plaintiffs’ opposition. Plaintiffs agreed to the extension. The extension will

9

enable Defendants to coordinate their efforts and to provide this Court with comprehensive

10
11

briefing on potentially dispositive issues in this consolidated litigation.
3.

The following time modifications have been made in this litigation, all based upon

12

stipulations: April 13, 2010 (Docket No. 13), May 27, 2010 (Docket No. 21), June 11, 2010

13

(Docket No. 24), August 17, 2010 (Docket No. 45); December 20, 2010 (Docket No. 77; Docket

14

No. 19 in Nabors), February 10, 2011 (Docket No. 82; Docket No. 25 in Nabors); April 6, 2011

15

(Docket No. 92; Docket No. 34 in Nabors), April 21, 2011 (Docket No. 96; Docket No. 38 in

16

Nabors), October 11, 2011 (Docket No. 112).

17

4.

The requested two-week extension would have no effect on the schedule set for

18

this case. The reply would be filed on November 28, over two months before the motion hearing

19

set for February 3, 2010.

20
21

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true. Executed on November 11,
2010, at San Francisco, California.

22

/s/ Rosemarie T. Ring

23

Rosemarie T. Ring

24
25
26
27
28
12946794.1

1

DECLARATION OF ROSEMARIE T. RING
CASE NO. C 10-01177 EJD