McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT by Google, Inc., HTC Corp., Mary McKinney, T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Larrabee, Matthew) (Filed on 5/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (No. 97147) DECHERT LLP One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94111-3513 Telephone: 415.262.4500 Facsimile: 415.262.4555 STEVEN B.WEISBURD (No. 171490) steven.weisburd@dechert.com DECHERT LLP 300 West 6th Street Suite 2010 Austin, TX 78701 Telephone: 512.394.3000 Facsimile: 512.394.3001 Attorneys for Defendants, GOOGLE INC. WAYNE S. KREGER (No. 154759) SARA D. AVILA (No. 263213) MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, CA 90405 Telephone: (310) 396-9600 Facsimile: (310) 396-9635 E-Mail: wkreger@maklawyers.com; savila@maklawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Mary McKinney HENRY WEISSMANN (No. 132418) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 E-mail: Henry.Weissmann@mto.com ROSEMARIE T. RING (No. 220769) SARALA V. NAGALA (No. 258712) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 E-Mail: Rose.Ring@mto.com; Sarala.Nagala@mto.com Attorneys for Defendant, HTC Corporation JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (No. 169522) JAMES C. GRANT (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111-6533 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 E-Mail: joeaddiego@dwt.com; jamesgrant@dwt.com Attorneys for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARY McKINNEY, et al., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, HTC CORP., a Taiwanese corporation, and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. C 10-01177 JW Action filed: April 15, 2010 STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, defendants Google Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc. removed this action from the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Clara to this Court; WHEREAS, on March 29, 2010 the parties stipulated that defendants Google Inc., TMobile USA, Inc., and HTC Corporation (the "Defendants") must respond to the complaint on May 25, 2010; WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff Mary McKinney have informed Defendants of their intention to file an Amended Complaint in this Court; WHEREAS, in order to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of judicial resources or effort by the parties to this action and the Court prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the parties to this action have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the proposed Amended Complaint; and NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, respectfully stipulate as follows: 1. 2. Plaintiff shall file her Amended Complaint by June 11, 2010; Defendants shall file and serve any answer(s) or motion(s) to dismiss by July 12, 2010, which is thirty (30) days from service of the Amended Complaint; 3. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Defendants' motions(s) to dismiss by August 11, 2010 and Defendants shall file any reply in support of the motion(s) to dismiss by August 25, 2010. 4. Defendants need not respond to the current Complaint. 1 STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O DATED: May 21, 2010 DECHERT LLP By: /s/ Matthew L. Larrabee MATTHEW L. LARRABEE Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. DATED: May 21, 2010 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP By: /s/ Wayne S. Kreger WAYNE S. KREGER Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY MCKINNEY DATED: May 21, 2010 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP By: /s/ James C. Grant JAMES C. GRANT Attorneys for Defendant T-MOBILE USA, INC. DATED: May 21, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring ROSEMARIE T. RING Attorneys for Defendant HTC CORPORATION 2 STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Additional Counsel: JOE R. WHATLEY, JR. (Pro Hac Vice Pending) EDITH M. KALLAS (Pro Hac Vice Pending) PATRICK J. SHEEHAN (Pro Hac Vice Pending) WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC 1540 Broadway, 37th Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 447-7070 Facsimile: (212) 447-7077 E-Mail: jwhatley@wdklaw.com; ekallas@wdklaw.com; psheehan@wdklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Mary McKinney BRIAN W. SMITH SMITH & VANTURE, LLP 1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (800) 443-4529 Attorneys for Plaintiff Mary McKinney HOWARD RUBINSTEIN LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD RUBINSTEIN 914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20 Aspen, CO 81611 Telephone: (832) 715-2788 Attorneys for Plaintiff Mary McKinney 3 STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O CERTIFICATION I, Matthew L. Larrabee, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Wayne S. Kreger, James C. Grant and Rosemarie T. Ring have concurred in this filing. 4 STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?