McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 59

Declaration of Sara D. Avila In Support of Unopposed Administrative 59 Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Mary McKinney. (Avila, Sara) (Filed on 10/4/2010) Modified on 10/5/2010,(link) (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Milstein, Adelman & Kreger, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP WAYNE S. KREGER, State Bar No. 154759 wkreger@maklawyers.com SARA D. AVILA, State Bar No. 263213 savila@maklawyers.com 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 Telephone (310) 396-9600 Facsimile (310) 396-9635 WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC Joe R. Whatley, Jr. (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No.4406088) jwhatley@wdklaw.com Edith M. Kallas (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 2200434) ekallas@wdklaw.com Patrick J. Sheehan (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 3016060) psheehan@wdklaw.com 1540 Broadway, 37th Floor New York, New York 10036 Tel: (212) 447-7070 Fax: (212) 447-7077 Attorneys for Plaintiff Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARY McKINNEY, et al., Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, HTC CORP., a Taiwanese corporation, and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-cv-01177-JW CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DECLARATION OF SARA D. AVILA IN SUPPORT OF UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED DECLARATION OF SARA D. AVILA IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Milstein, Adelman & Kreger LLP I, Sara D. Avila, declare as follows: 1. I am a member in good standing of the California State Bar and an attorney at the law firm of Milstein, Adelman & Kreger LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiff in Mary McKinney v. Google Inc., et al., Case No 10-cv-01177-JW. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge, and if called to testify to the contents, I could and would competently do so. 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the class action complaint filed on August 31, 2010 in Nathan Nabors v Google Inc., Case No. 10-cv-03897-HRL. 3. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the class action complaint filed on March 22, 2010 in Mary McKinney v. Google Inc., et al., Case No 10-cv-01177-JW, and assigned to the Honorable James Ware. 4. On September 30, 2010 I spoke with France Jaffe, counsel for Google, Inc. regarding the instant motion. Counsel informed me Google does not oppose the instant motion to the extent Plaintiff seeks an order of this Court that the McKinney and Nabors cases be deemed related. 11 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true and correct and that this declaration was executed this 4th day of October, 2010, in Santa Monica, California. By: ___/s/ Sara D. Avila______ Sara D. Avila 1 DECLARATION OF SARA D. AVILA IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?