McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 90

STIPULATION STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME by Google, Inc., HTC Corp., Mary McKinney. (Larrabee, Matthew) (Filed on 4/5/2011)

1
2
3

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (No. 97147)
DECHERT LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111-3513
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.262.4555

4
5
6
7
8
9

STEVEN B.WEISBURD (No. 171490)
[e-mail]
DECHERT LLP
300 West 6th Street
Suite 2010
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 512.394.3001
Attorneys for Defendants,
GOOGLE INC.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

HENRY WEISSMANN (No. 132418)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
ROSEMARIE T. RING (No. 220769)
SARALA V. NAGALA (No. 258712)
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, HTC Corporation

WAYNE S. KREGER (No. 154759)
SARA D. AVILA (No. 263213)
MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Mary McKinney
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN JOSE DIVISION

21
MARY McKINNEY, et al.,

Case No. C 10-01177 JW

22
Plaintiff,

Action filed: April 15, 2010

23
v.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME

24
25
26

GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
HTC CORP., a Taiwanese corporation, and
T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendants.

27
28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION

Case No. C 10-1177 JW

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties request an order changing the time in which

2

defendants Google Inc. and HTC Corporation (the “Defendants”) must file their reply in support

3

of their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Mary McKinney

4

(“McKinney”):

5

WHEREAS Defendants currently must file their reply on April 11, 2011;

6

WHEREAS McKinney has agreed, subject to this Court’s approval, to extend the

7
8
9
10
11
12

Defendants’ deadline for filing their reply until April 18, 2011, and,
WHEREAS this extension will alter a time frame set by the local rules of this Court and
therefore requires a Court order for such an extension;
NOW THEREFORE, McKinney and Defendants through their counsel of record, and
subject to this Court’s approval, stipulate to the following:
Defendants’ deadline for filing a reply in support of their motion to dismiss McKinney’s

13

Second Amended Complaint should be extended from April 11, 2011 until April 18, 2011.

14

Although the parties are not requesting that the current April 25, 2011 hearing date be continued,

15

should the Court choose to continue the hearing sua sponte, the schedule of the case will be

16

extended until such time as the Court may hear the motion to dismiss.

17
18

DATED: April 5, 2011

DECHERT LLP

19
By:

20
21

Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

22
23

/s/ Matthew L. Larrabee
MATTHEW L. LARRABEE

DATED: April 5, 2011

MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP

24
By:

25
26

/s/ Sara Avila
SARA AVILA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MCKINNEY

27
28
D ECHERT LLP

1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION

Case No. C 10-1177 JW

1

DATED: April 5, 2011

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

2
By:

3
4

/s/ Rosemarie T. Ring
ROSEMARIE T. RING
Attorneys for Defendant
HTC CORPORATION

5
6
7

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

HON. JAMES WARE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D ECHERT LLP

2

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION

Case No. C 10-1177 JW

1

CERTIFICATION

2

I, Matthew Larrabee, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used

3

to file this STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME. In compliance with

4

General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Sara Avila and Rosemarie T. Ring concurred in this

5

filing.

6
7
8

14062343.2

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D ECHERT LLP

3

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION

Case No. C 10-1177 JW