McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 92

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Date for Filing Reply Brief re 90 Stipulation. Reply due 4/18/2011. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)

McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Doc. 92

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (No. 97147) DECHERT LLP One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94111-3513 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.262.4555 STEVEN B.WEISBURD (No. 171490) [e-mail] DECHERT LLP 300 West 6th Street Suite 2010 Austin, TX 78701 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 512.394.3001 Attorneys for Defendants, GOOGLE INC. WAYNE S. KREGER (No. 154759) SARA D. AVILA (No. 263213) MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, CA 90405 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]; [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff, Mary McKinney [Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

HENRY WEISSMANN (No. 132418) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] ROSEMARIE T. RING (No. 220769) SARALA V. NAGALA (No. 258712) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]; [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant, HTC Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
MARY McKINNEY, et al., Case No. C 10-01177 JW Action filed: April 15, 2010 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME

22 Plaintiff, 23 v. 24 25 26 27 28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, HTC CORP., a Taiwanese corporation, and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

STIPULATION

Case No. C 10-1177 JW
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties request an order changing the time in which defendants Google Inc. and HTC Corporation (the "Defendants") must file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Mary McKinney ("McKinney"): WHEREAS Defendants currently must file their reply on April 11, 2011; WHEREAS McKinney has agreed, subject to this Court's approval, to extend the Defendants' deadline for filing their reply until April 18, 2011, and, WHEREAS this extension will alter a time frame set by the local rules of this Court and therefore requires a Court order for such an extension; NOW THEREFORE, McKinney and Defendants through their counsel of record, and subject to this Court's approval, stipulate to the following: Defendants' deadline for filing a reply in support of their motion to dismiss McKinney's Second Amended Complaint should be extended from April 11, 2011 until April 18, 2011. Although the parties are not requesting that the current April 25, 2011 hearing date be continued, should the Court choose to continue the hearing sua sponte, the schedule of the case will be extended until such time as the Court may hear the motion to dismiss.

DATED: April 5, 2011

DECHERT LLP By: /s/ Matthew L. Larrabee MATTHEW L. LARRABEE Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.

DATED: April 5, 2011

MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP By: /s/ Sara Avila SARA AVILA Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY MCKINNEY

1
STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

DATED: April 5, 2011

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring ROSEMARIE T. RING Attorneys for Defendant HTC CORPORATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 6, 2011 HON. JAMES WARE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

2
STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
D ECHERT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

CERTIFICATION I, Matthew Larrabee, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Sara Avila and Rosemarie T. Ring concurred in this filing.

14062343.2

3
STIPULATION Case No. C 10-1177 JW