McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 93

STIPULATION and Proposed Order Continuing the Hearing Date for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Mary McKinney. (Avila, Sara) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MILSTEIN | ADELMAN, LLP SARA D. AVILA, State Bar No. 263213 savila@maklawyers.com 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 Telephone (310) 396-9600 Facsimile (310) 396-9635 WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC Joe R. Whatley, Jr. (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No.4406088) jwhatley@wdklaw.com Edith M. Kallas (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 2200434) ekallas@wdklaw.com Patrick J. Sheehan (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 3016060) psheehan@wdklaw.com 1540 Broadway, 37th Floor New York, New York 10036 Tel: (212) 447-7070 Fax: (212) 447-7077 Attorneys for Plaintiff Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MARY MCKINNEY, Individually and on ) ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; ) ) and, HTC CORP., a Delaware corporation. ) ) Defendants ) ) ) 5:10-cv-01177-JW (Hon. James Ware) PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)] Current Hearing Date: Proposed Hearing Date: April 25, 2011 May 2, 2011 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(b), the parties stipulate to a continuance of the hearing 25 date on Defendant Google Inc. and HTC Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss 26 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint to May 2, 2011. 27 WHEREAS, the hearing is currently set for April 25, 2011; 28 WHEREAS, an opposition has been filed to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; 1 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 5:10-CV-01177-JW 1 2 3 WHEREAS, the parties affected by the motion have not previously stipulated to continue the hearing date; WHEREAS, Plaintiff requested a continuance of the hearing date because, unless the 4 hearing is rescheduled, they must travel by airplane to San Jose on Easter Sunday to attend the 5 hearing scheduled for Monday, April 24, 2011 at 9:00am; 6 WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed, subject to this Court’s approval, to continue the 7 hearing date to May 2, 2011, or any date on or after June 6, 2011, that is convenient for the Court. 8 Counsel is unavailable May 9, 2011 through May 30. 9 10 11 WHEREAS, this extension will alter a time frame set by the local rules of this Court and therefore requires a Court order for such an extension; NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, through their counsel of record, and 12 subject to this Court’s approval, stipulate to the following: The April 25, 2011 hearing on 13 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to May 2, 2011, or any date on or after June 6, 14 2011, that is convenient to the Court. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 5:10-CV-01177-JW sf-2855868 1 DATED: April 15, 2011 MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP 2 By: 3 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY MCKINNEY 5 6 /s/ Sara Avila SARA AVILA DATED: April 15, 2011 WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC 7 8 By: 9 /s/ Adam Plant ADAM PLANT Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY MCKINNEY 10 11 12 DATED: April 15, 2011 DECHERT LLP 13 14 By: 15 /s/ Matthew L. Larrabee MATTHEW LARRABEE Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 16 17 18 DATED: April 15, 2011 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 19 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring ROSEMARIE T. RING Attorneys for Defendant HTC CORP. 24 25 26 27 28 3 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 5:10-CV-01177-JW sf-2855868 ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 3 Second Amended Complaint is continued to ___________________________. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Date: HON. JAMES WARE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 5:10-CV-01177-JW sf-2855868 CERTIFICATION 1 2 3 I, Sara D. Avila, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that France Jaffe and Rosemarie Ring concurred in this filing. 4 5 6 7 DATED: April 13, 2011 Attorney for Plaintiff Mary McKinney and the Proposed Class 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Sara D. Avila MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP Gillian L. Wade Sara D. Avila WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC Joe R. Whatley, Jr. Edith M. Kallas Patrick J. Sheehan LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD RUBINSTEIN Howard Rubinstein howardr@pdq.net 914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel: (832) 715-2788 SMITH & VANTURE, LLP Brian W. Smith bws@smithvanture.com 1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: (800) 443-4529 Fax: (561) 688-0630 24 25 26 27 28 5 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 5:10-CV-01177-JW sf-2855868

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?