McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Continuing the Hearing Date for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss re 93 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 83 MOTION to Dismiss SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: Motion Hearing set for 5/2/2011 09:00 AM before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/21/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MILSTEIN | ADELMAN, LLP
SARA D. AVILA, State Bar No. 263213
[e-mail]
2800 Donald Douglas Loop North
Santa Monica, California 90405
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC
Joe R. Whatley, Jr. (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No.4406088)
[e-mail]
Edith M. Kallas (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 2200434)
[e-mail]
Patrick J. Sheehan (pro hac vice pending, NY Bar No. 3016060)
[e-mail]
1540 Broadway, 37th Floor
New York, New York 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MARY MCKINNEY, Individually and on )
)
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; )
)
and, HTC CORP., a Delaware corporation.
)
)
Defendants
)
)
)

5:10-cv-01177-JW (Hon. James Ware)
PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
THE HEARING DATE OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-7(b)]
Current Hearing Date:
Proposed Hearing Date:

April 25, 2011
May 2, 2011

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(b), the parties stipulate to a continuance of the hearing

25

date on Defendant Google Inc. and HTC Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss

26

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint to May 2, 2011.

27

WHEREAS, the hearing is currently set for April 25, 2011;

28

WHEREAS, an opposition has been filed to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss;
1

PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
5:10-CV-01177-JW

1
2
3

WHEREAS, the parties affected by the motion have not previously stipulated to continue
the hearing date;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requested a continuance of the hearing date because, unless the

4

hearing is rescheduled, they must travel by airplane to San Jose on Easter Sunday to attend the

5

hearing scheduled for Monday, April 24, 2011 at 9:00am;

6

WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed, subject to this Court’s approval, to continue the

7

hearing date to May 2, 2011, or any date on or after June 6, 2011, that is convenient for the Court.

8

Counsel is unavailable May 9, 2011 through May 30.

9
10
11

WHEREAS, this extension will alter a time frame set by the local rules of this Court and
therefore requires a Court order for such an extension;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, through their counsel of record, and

12

subject to this Court’s approval, stipulate to the following: The April 25, 2011 hearing on

13

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to May 2, 2011, or any date on or after June 6,

14

2011, that is convenient to the Court.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
5:10-CV-01177-JW
sf-2855868

1

DATED: April 15, 2011

MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP

2
By:

3
4

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MCKINNEY

5
6

/s/ Sara Avila
SARA AVILA

DATED: April 15, 2011

WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC

7
8

By:

9

/s/ Adam Plant
ADAM PLANT

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MCKINNEY

10
11
12

DATED: April 15, 2011

DECHERT LLP

13
14

By:

15

/s/ Matthew L. Larrabee
MATTHEW LARRABEE

Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

16
17
18

DATED: April 15, 2011

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

19
20
21
22
23

By:

/s/ Rosemarie T. Ring
ROSEMARIE T. RING

Attorneys for Defendant
HTC CORP.

24
25
26
27
28
3
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
5:10-CV-01177-JW
sf-2855868

ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

3

Second Amended Complaint is continued to ___________________________.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 2, 2011

5
6

Date:

April 21, 2011

HON. JAMES WARE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
5:10-CV-01177-JW
sf-2855868

CERTIFICATION
1
2
3

I, Sara D. Avila, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order
45.X.B., I hereby attest that France Jaffe and Rosemarie Ring concurred in this filing.

4
5
6
7

DATED: April 13, 2011

Attorney for Plaintiff Mary McKinney and the
Proposed Class

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

By: /s/ Sara D. Avila
MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP
Gillian L. Wade
Sara D. Avila
WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC
Joe R. Whatley, Jr.
Edith M. Kallas
Patrick J. Sheehan
LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD
RUBINSTEIN
Howard Rubinstein
[e-mail]
914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tel: [phone]
SMITH & VANTURE, LLP
Brian W. Smith
[e-mail]
1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

24
25
26
27
28
5
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
5:10-CV-01177-JW
sf-2855868