Li v. A Perfect Day Franchise, Inc

Filing 299

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 277 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 278 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 279 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 281 Motion to Compel; granting 282 Motion to Compel; granting 284 Motion to Compel (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17

GUIFU LI, MENG WANG, FANG DAI, LIN )
CUI, and ZHONG YU, on behalf of themselves )
and all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
A PERFECT DAY FRANCHISE, INC., a
)
California Corporation, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 10-CV-01189-LHK
ORDER REGARDING VARIOUS
DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND
SETTING CASE SCHEDULE

18
19
20
21

A hearing on discovery motions was held on November 21, 2011. The Court ruled, on the
record, as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Regarding Financial Information

22

(ECF No. 277), is GRANTED, in part, for the reasons stated on the record. The Order

23

is limited to information since March 22, 2006 going forward.

24
25
26
27
28

2. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Anna Tong (ECF No. 284), is
GRANTED for the reasons stated on the record.
3. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Depositions of Defendants (ECF No. 281), is
GRANTED, in part, for the reasons stated in the record. Plaintiffs shall be permitted to
1
Case No.: 10-CV-01189-LHK
ORDER REGARDING VARIOUS DISCOVERY MOTIONS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

depose Jun Ma for an additional 5 hours; to depose Tailing Li for an additional 4 hours;
and to question Jin Qui for 7 hours as permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Defendants are not ordered to produce Jade Li for deposition, but are
required to ask Ms. Li if she will agree to sit for 3 additional hours of deposition.
4. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Responses to
Interrogatories (ECF No. 282), is GRANTED, for the reasons stated in the record.
5. Defendants’ Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories (ECF No. 278), and
Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents (ECF No. 279),
is GRANTED, in part and DENIED, in part, for the reasons stated on the record.
Plaintiffs shall produce Feng Wang for deposition; Plaintiffs shall provide verification
for the discovery responses of Feng Wang and Baeong Lu by November 28, 2011;
Plaintiffs shall provide interrogatory responses for any three other opt-in Plaintiffs that
have not yet produced interrogatory responses; and Plaintiffs shall produce documents
referenced in the depositions of opt-in Plaintiffs.
The following case schedule was set:
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is set for December 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
FACT DISCOVERY CUT OFF is December 16, 2011
EXPERT DISCOVERY as follows:
Opening Expert Reports: December 2, 2011
Rebuttal Expert Reports: December 20, 2011
Close of Expert Discovery: January 5, 2012
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT last day to file is January 12, 2012. The page
limitations set forth in the September 29, 2011 case management order shall control.
LAST DAY FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING is February 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE remains March 21, 2012, at 2 p.m.
JURY TRIAL remains April 2, 2012, at 9 a.m. in courtroom 8, 4th floor.

25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 10-CV-01189-LHK
ORDER REGARDING VARIOUS DISCOVERY MOTIONS

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 21, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Case No.: 10-CV-01189-LHK
ORDER REGARDING VARIOUS DISCOVERY MOTIONS