Aerielle Technologies Inc v. Belkin International Inc et al

Filing 176

ORDER re 174 Stipulation to Join Aerielle IP Holdings LLC as a Named Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/16/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)

Download PDF
Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235) mark.fowler@dlapiper.com BRENT YAMASHITA (Bar No. 206890) brent.yamashita@dlapiper.com CHRISTINE CORBETT (Bar No. 209128) christine.corbett@dlapiper.com CARRIE WILLIAMSON (Bar No. 230873) carrie.williamson@dlapiper.com CHANG KIM (Bar No. 273393) changu.kim@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215 Tel: 650.833.2000 Fax: 650.833.2001 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 Filed12/16/11 Page1 of 3 ROBERT W. DICKERSON (State Bar No. 89367) dickersonr@dicksteinshapiro.com YASSER EL-GAMAL (State Bar. No. 189047) elgamaly@dicksteinshapiro.com DAVID A. RANDALL (State Bar. No. 156722) randalld@dicksteinshapiro.com DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 700 Los Angeles, California 90067-3109 Telephone: (310) 772-8300 Facsimile: (310) 772-8301 JEFFREY A. MILLER (State Bar No. 160602) millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 700 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 632-4308 Facsimile: (650) 632-4333 Attorneys for Defendants 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 AERIELLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 CASE NO. C 10-01301 LHK (HRL) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF v. BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BEST BUY CO., INC.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BEST BUY STORES, L.P.; and RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 WHEREAS, Aerielle IP Holdings LLC (“Aerielle IP”) claims to be the current owner of the two patents asserted in the present litigation; 25 WHEREAS Aerielle IP and the current plaintiff, Aerielle Technologies, Inc. (“Aerielle 26 Tech”), have moved the Court to substitute Aerielle IP for Aerielle Tech as the plaintiff in the 27 present litigation; 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF WEST\226923227.1 371052-000008 Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174 1 2 3 Filed12/16/11 Page2 of 3 WHEREAS, the parties, including Aerielle IP, have reached a global settlement of the present litigation as to all claims, defenses and counterclaims; WHEREAS, the parties desire all of the claims and counterclaims of the present litigation 4 to be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties, including Aerielle IP, so as to ensure that the 5 Dismissal with Prejudice is fully effective according to the intent of the global settlement; 6 WHEREAS, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their attorneys of 7 record, that Aerielle IP be joined pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) as a plaintiff with the original 8 plaintiff Aerielle Tech. 9 10 11 NOW THEREFORE, having shown good cause, the parties respectfully request the entry of an Order joining Aerielle IP as a co-plaintiff in this litigation with Aerielle Tech. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 14 DATED: December 16, 2011 15 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP By: /s/ Robert W. Dickerson Robert W. Dickerson Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 DATED: December 16, 2011 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 19 20 By: /s/ Christine Corbett Christine Corbett Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF WEST\226923227.1 371052-000008 Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174 1 2 3 Filed12/16/11 Page3 of 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. December 16 DATED: __________________, 2011 4 LUCY H. KOH United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF WEST\226923227.1 371052-000008

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?