Aerielle Technologies Inc v. Belkin International Inc et al
Filing
176
ORDER re 174 Stipulation to Join Aerielle IP Holdings LLC as a Named Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/16/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235)
mark.fowler@dlapiper.com
BRENT YAMASHITA (Bar No. 206890)
brent.yamashita@dlapiper.com
CHRISTINE CORBETT (Bar No. 209128)
christine.corbett@dlapiper.com
CARRIE WILLIAMSON (Bar No. 230873)
carrie.williamson@dlapiper.com
CHANG KIM (Bar No. 273393)
changu.kim@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215
Tel: 650.833.2000
Fax: 650.833.2001
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
Filed12/16/11 Page1 of 3
ROBERT W. DICKERSON (State Bar No. 89367)
dickersonr@dicksteinshapiro.com
YASSER EL-GAMAL (State Bar. No. 189047)
elgamaly@dicksteinshapiro.com
DAVID A. RANDALL (State Bar. No. 156722)
randalld@dicksteinshapiro.com
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90067-3109
Telephone: (310) 772-8300
Facsimile: (310) 772-8301
JEFFREY A. MILLER (State Bar No. 160602)
millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
700 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 632-4308
Facsimile: (650) 632-4333
Attorneys for Defendants
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
AERIELLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
CASE NO. C 10-01301 LHK (HRL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP
HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED
PLAINTIFF
v.
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BEST BUY
CO., INC.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BEST BUY
STORES, L.P.; and RADIOSHACK
CORPORATION,
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
WHEREAS, Aerielle IP Holdings LLC (“Aerielle IP”) claims to be the current owner of
the two patents asserted in the present litigation;
25
WHEREAS Aerielle IP and the current plaintiff, Aerielle Technologies, Inc. (“Aerielle
26
Tech”), have moved the Court to substitute Aerielle IP for Aerielle Tech as the plaintiff in the
27
present litigation;
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF
WEST\226923227.1
371052-000008
Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174
1
2
3
Filed12/16/11 Page2 of 3
WHEREAS, the parties, including Aerielle IP, have reached a global settlement of the
present litigation as to all claims, defenses and counterclaims;
WHEREAS, the parties desire all of the claims and counterclaims of the present litigation
4
to be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties, including Aerielle IP, so as to ensure that the
5
Dismissal with Prejudice is fully effective according to the intent of the global settlement;
6
WHEREAS, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their attorneys of
7
record, that Aerielle IP be joined pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) as a plaintiff with the original
8
plaintiff Aerielle Tech.
9
10
11
NOW THEREFORE, having shown good cause, the parties respectfully request the entry
of an Order joining Aerielle IP as a co-plaintiff in this litigation with Aerielle Tech.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
14
DATED: December 16, 2011
15
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
By: /s/ Robert W. Dickerson
Robert W. Dickerson
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17
18
DATED: December 16, 2011
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
19
20
By: /s/ Christine Corbett
Christine Corbett
Attorneys for Plaintiff
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF
WEST\226923227.1
371052-000008
Case5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document174
1
2
3
Filed12/16/11 Page3 of 3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 16
DATED: __________________, 2011
4
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO JOIN AERIELLE IP HOLDINGS LLC AS A NAMED PLAINTIFF
WEST\226923227.1
371052-000008
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?