Aerielle Technologies Inc v. Belkin International Inc et al

Filing 182

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORTS 1-4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/5/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed January 5, 2012 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 AERIELLE TECHNOLOGIES INC.; et al., No. C10-01301 LHK (HRL) Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORTS 1-4 v. 13 BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; et al., [Re: Docket No. 161, 162, 163, 164] 14 15 16 Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Judge Koh’s Order of January 4, 2012 dismissing the entire above-captioned 17 action with prejudice, and parties’ stipulation thereto, the Discovery Dispute Joint Reports 1-4 18 currently pending before this court are DENIED as MOOT. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2012 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 C10-01301 LHK Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Brent Yamashita Carrie Williamson Chang Up Kim Christine Corbett Mark Fowler Robert Dickerson David Randall Jeffrey Miller Robert Gingher Yasser El-Gamal 3 4 5 6 brent.yamashita@dlapiper.com carrie.williamson@dlapiper.com changu.kim@dlapiper.com christine.corbett@dlapiper.com mark.fowler@dlapiper.com DickersonR@dicksteinshapiro.com randalld@dicksteinshapiro.com MillerJ@dicksteinshapiro.com gingherr@dicksteinshapiro.com elgamaly@dicksteinshapiro.com 7 8 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?