Aerielle Technologies Inc v. Belkin International Inc et al
Filing
182
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORTS 1-4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/5/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
1
** E-filed January 5, 2012 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
AERIELLE TECHNOLOGIES INC.; et al.,
No. C10-01301 LHK (HRL)
Plaintiffs,
12
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
JOINT REPORTS 1-4
v.
13
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; et al.,
[Re: Docket No. 161, 162, 163, 164]
14
15
16
Defendants.
____________________________________/
Pursuant to Judge Koh’s Order of January 4, 2012 dismissing the entire above-captioned
17
action with prejudice, and parties’ stipulation thereto, the Discovery Dispute Joint Reports 1-4
18
currently pending before this court are DENIED as MOOT.
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
C10-01301 LHK Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Brent Yamashita
Carrie Williamson
Chang Up Kim
Christine Corbett
Mark Fowler
Robert Dickerson
David Randall
Jeffrey Miller
Robert Gingher
Yasser El-Gamal
3
4
5
6
brent.yamashita@dlapiper.com
carrie.williamson@dlapiper.com
changu.kim@dlapiper.com
christine.corbett@dlapiper.com
mark.fowler@dlapiper.com
DickersonR@dicksteinshapiro.com
randalld@dicksteinshapiro.com
MillerJ@dicksteinshapiro.com
gingherr@dicksteinshapiro.com
elgamaly@dicksteinshapiro.com
7
8
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?