National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al v. Resource Development Services, Inc. et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. AND JAMES LUCERO TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (approving 67 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/13/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)

1 MARTÍN A. SABELLI California Bar No. 164772 2 149 Natoma Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94105 3 [phone] 4 [e-mail] 5 JOSH A. COHEN California Bar No. 217853 6 633 Battery Street, Suite 110 San Francisco, California 94111 7 [phone] 8 [e-mail] 9 Attorneys for Defendants RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. and JAMES 10 LUCERO 11 12 13 14 15

**E-Filed 8/13/2010**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. C-10-01324 JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. AND JAMES LUCERO TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 16 COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, 17 18 v. Plaintiff,

19 RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION WHEREAS plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh ("National Union") filed its original complaint in this action on March 29, 2010; WHEREAS defendants Resources Development Services, Inc. ("RDS") and James Lucero were not served with a copy of the original complaint;

Case No. C-10-1324 JF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1 2

WHEREAS plaintiff National Union filed a First Amended Complaint on June 1, 2010; WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero were served with a copy of the First

3 Amended Complaint on or about July 22, 2010; 4 WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero have 21 days to answer or otherwise

5 respond to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1); 6 WHEREAS defendants RDS and James Lucero recently retained counsel to represent them

7 in this matter; 8 WHEREAS counsel for defendants RDS and James Lucero require additional time to

9 review the First Amendment Complaint and prepare an answer or other response thereto; 10 WHEREAS plaintiff's counsel does not object to extending the time in which defendants

11 RDS and James Lucero may answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint; 12 13 WHEREAS the next hearing in this matter is presently scheduled for September 24, 2010; IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadline by which defendants

14 RDS and James Lucero must answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint should 15 be extended to September 3, 2010. 16 17 18 DATED: August 11, 2010 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-10-1324 JF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

/s/ Josh Cohen MARTÍN A. SABELLI JOSH A. COHEN Attorneys for Defendants Resources Development Services, Inc. and James Lucero

DATED: August 11, 2010

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY /s/ Eugene Suh EUGENE SUH Attorneys for Plaintiff

2

1 2

ORDER By stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that defendants Resources

3 Development Services, Inc. and James Lucero shall have until September 3, 2010 to answer or 4 otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. 5 6 August 13 7 DATED: ______________, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-10-1324 JF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3