Rivera et al v. Rivera

Filing 31

ORDER That Case Be Reassigned. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 29, 2011. (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)

Download PDF
Rivera et al v. Rivera Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 On February 15, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgement. As this case has 19 been assigned to a magistrate judge, each party must either file written consent to the jurisdiction 20 21 ordered the parties to file either a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," or 22 else a "Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for 23 Reassignment." 24 Plaintiffs consented on March 28, 2011. Defendant has neither consented nor declined to 25 proceed before a magistrate judge. As Plaintiffs have moved for final order against a party who has 26 not consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ADAN RIVERA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) NEFTAIL CANDELARIO RIVERA, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 10-01345 PSG ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED of the magistrate judge or request reassignment to a district judge. 1 On March 23, 2011, the court See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). ORDER, page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case be reassigned to a district judge. Dated: March 29, 2011 PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge ORDER, page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?