Marlow et al v. Cullen et al

Filing 27

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS OR NOTICE THAT MOTION IS UNWARRANTED. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/9/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)

Download PDF
Marlow et al v. Cullen et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOT FOR CITATION 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 JAMES GREGORY MARLOW, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT S. CULLEN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-01417 JF (PR) ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS OR NOTICE THAT MOTION IS UNWARRANTED Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). (Docket No. 3.) On August 25, 2010, the Court ordered Defendant Warden Vincent S. Cullen to address whether Plaintiff's motion should be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) by filing a motion to dismiss or a notice that such motion is unwarranted. (Docket No. 22.) Defendant was directed to file a response within forty-five days of the date he is served with the court order. (Id. at 4.) The time has long since passed, and Defendant has not responded. In the interest of justice, the Court will extend the time for Defendant to respond. The clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, Order Extending Time to File Response P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\CR.10\Marlow01417_resend.wpd 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, all attachments thereto, a copy of the court order filed on August 25, 2010, (Docket No. 22), and a copy of this order upon Defendant Warden Vincent S. Cullen at San Quentin State Prison. The Clerk shall also send a courtesy copy of all of the above to the Attorney General's Office. Defendant shall file with the Court and serve upon Plaintiff, within forty-five (45) days of the date he is served with this order, a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), or a notice that Defendant is of the opinion that a motion to dismiss is unwarranted. All remaining provisions of the court's August 25, 2010 Order shall remain in effect, and briefing shall proceed in accordance with the schedule set forth therein. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 3/9/11 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge Order Extending Time to File Response P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\CR.10\Marlow01417_resend.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES G. MARLOW, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT S. CULLEN, et al., Defendants. / Case Number: CV10-01417 JF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 3/11/11 , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. James Gregory Marlow E-32700 CSP-San Quentin CA State Prison at San Quentin San Quentin, CA 94974 Dated: 3/11/11 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?