Feldman v. Google, Inc.

Filing 8

CLERKS NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of the Court's unavailability, the Case Management Conference is continued from 07/27/2010 to 8/17/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement by 08/10/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION ** E-filed June 28, 2010 ** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION BARRY FELDMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, No. C10-01433 HRL CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ____________________________________/ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, in view of this court's unavailability, the Case Management Conference, currently set for July 27, 2010, has been continued to Tuesday, August 17, 2010 in Courtroom 2, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by August 10, 2010. Dated: June 28, 2010 /s/ DCA Chambers of Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C10-01433 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Christopher A. Seeger Eric David Freed Jonathan Shub cseeger@seegerweiss.com, Dmora@seegerweiss.com, jgrand@seegerweiss.com eric@freedweiss.com, paul@freedweiss.com, sherrie@freedweiss.com jshub@shublaw.com, atorres@seegerweiss.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?