Ferrington et al v. McAfee, Inc.

Filing 91

***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE DOCKET # 92 ***

Download PDF
1 5 Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld – 121944 Shirley Huey – 224114 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 ggrunfeld@rbg-law.com shuey@rbg-law.com 6 Local Counsel for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 Andrew N. Friedman- admitted pro hac vice Victoria S. Nugent – admitted pro hac vice Stefanie M. Ramirez – admitted pro hac vice COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 West Washington, D.C. 20005-3964 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 vnugent@cohenmilstein.com Matthew N. Metz - 154995 METZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7230 Seattle, Washington 98104-7042 Telephone: (206) 583-2745 Facsimile: (206) 625-8683 matthew@metzlaw.net Counsel for Plaintiffs 12 Counsel for Plaintiffs 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 18 MELISSA FERRINGTON and CHERYL SCHMIDT, individually and on behalf of the class they represent, Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 NO. 5:10-cv-01455 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND REBUTTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE v. Local Rule 7-3(d) MCAFEE INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. 22 23 24 Plaintiffs Melissa Ferrington and Cheryl Schmidt (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant McAfee, 25 Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, STIPULATE 26 AS FOLLOWS: 27 WHEREAS, McAfee filed a Request for Judicial Notice and a Declaration of Carlos 28 NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND REBUTTAL BRIEFS 1 Ochoa in Support of Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice on June 10, 2010; 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to the Request for Judicial Notice on July 29, 2010; WHEREAS, McAfee filed its Reply and a Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Ochoa on August 26, 2010; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs contend that the Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Ochoa raises 7 a number of factual issues that were neither addressed in the Initial Declaration nor in any of 8 Defendant’s previously filed papers; 9 10 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court’s approval: 11 On or before September 14, 2010, Plaintiffs may file a three-page Sur-reply which may 12 address only any new facts Plaintiffs contend are presented in the Supplemental Declaration of 13 Carlos Ochoa and McAfee may file a three-page rebuttal on or before September 21, 2010. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: September 14, 2010 By: /s/ Victoria S. Nugent______________ Andrew N. Friedman Victoria S. Nugent Stefanie M. Ramirez COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 500, West Tower Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld Shirley Huey ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 Local Counsel for Plaintiffs Melissa Ferrington and Cheryl Schmidt 28 -2- NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND REBUTTAL BRIEFS 1 4 Matthew N. Metz METZ LAW GROUP, PLLC 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7230 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone: (206) 583-2745 Facsimile: (206) 625-8683 5 Counsel for Plaintiffs 2 3 6 7 Dated: September 14, 2010 By: /s/ Daniel K. Slaughter______________ 10 Daniel K. Slaughter STEIN & LUBIN 600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 955-5037 Facsimile: (415) 981-4343 11 Counsel for Defendant 8 9 12 13 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER 15 16 17 18 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2010 Honorable Lucy H. Koh Judge of the United States District Court 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 879856.1 1 28 -3- NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND REBUTTAL BRIEFS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?