Ferrington et al v. McAfee, Inc.
Filing
91
***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE DOCKET # 92 ***
1
5
Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld – 121944
Shirley Huey – 224114
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-1823
Telephone:
(415) 433-6830
Facsimile:
(415) 433-7104
ggrunfeld@rbg-law.com
shuey@rbg-law.com
6
Local Counsel for Plaintiffs
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
Andrew N. Friedman- admitted pro hac vice
Victoria S. Nugent – admitted pro hac vice
Stefanie M. Ramirez – admitted pro hac vice
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 West
Washington, D.C. 20005-3964
Telephone:
(202) 408-4600
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4699
vnugent@cohenmilstein.com
Matthew N. Metz - 154995
METZ LAW GROUP, PLLC
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7230
Seattle, Washington 98104-7042
Telephone:
(206) 583-2745
Facsimile:
(206) 625-8683
matthew@metzlaw.net
Counsel for Plaintiffs
12
Counsel for Plaintiffs
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
18
MELISSA FERRINGTON and CHERYL
SCHMIDT, individually and on behalf of
the class they represent,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
NO. 5:10-cv-01455
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND
REBUTTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
v.
Local Rule 7-3(d)
MCAFEE INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
22
23
24
Plaintiffs Melissa Ferrington and Cheryl Schmidt (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant McAfee,
25
Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, STIPULATE
26
AS FOLLOWS:
27
WHEREAS, McAfee filed a Request for Judicial Notice and a Declaration of Carlos
28
NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED]
ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND
REBUTTAL BRIEFS
1
Ochoa in Support of Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice on June 10, 2010;
2
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to the Request for Judicial Notice on July 29,
2010;
WHEREAS, McAfee filed its Reply and a Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Ochoa on
August 26, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs contend that the Supplemental Declaration of Carlos Ochoa raises
7
a number of factual issues that were neither addressed in the Initial Declaration nor in any of
8
Defendant’s previously filed papers;
9
10
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND
BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court’s approval:
11
On or before September 14, 2010, Plaintiffs may file a three-page Sur-reply which may
12
address only any new facts Plaintiffs contend are presented in the Supplemental Declaration of
13
Carlos Ochoa and McAfee may file a three-page rebuttal on or before September 21, 2010.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: September 14, 2010
By: /s/ Victoria S. Nugent______________
Andrew N. Friedman
Victoria S. Nugent
Stefanie M. Ramirez
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
Shirley Huey
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-1823
Telephone: (415) 433-6830
Facsimile: (415) 433-7104
Local Counsel for Plaintiffs
Melissa Ferrington and Cheryl Schmidt
28
-2-
NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED]
ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND
REBUTTAL BRIEFS
1
4
Matthew N. Metz
METZ LAW GROUP, PLLC
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7230
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: (206) 583-2745
Facsimile: (206) 625-8683
5
Counsel for Plaintiffs
2
3
6
7
Dated: September 14, 2010
By: /s/ Daniel K. Slaughter______________
10
Daniel K. Slaughter
STEIN & LUBIN
600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 955-5037
Facsimile: (415) 981-4343
11
Counsel for Defendant
8
9
12
13
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2010
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
Judge of the United States District Court
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
879856.1 1
28
-3-
NO. 5:10-CV-01455: STIP. & [PROPOSED]
ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY AND
REBUTTAL BRIEFS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?