Schott v. Ivy Asset Manageetn Corp et al

Filing 15

ORDER re Deadline for Consent or Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Consents or declinations due by 6/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/14/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION STEPHEN C. SCHOTT, as TRUSTEE FOR THE STEPHEN C. SCHOTT 1984 TRUST, v. Plaintiff, No. C10-01562 HRL ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *E-FILED 06-14-2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IVY ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP.; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP.; and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. / The parties are reminded that this case has been assigned to a magistrate judge. No later than June 25, 2010, each party shall file either (1) a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See CIV. L.R. 73-1. The forms are available from the Clerk of the Court and on the court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:10-cv-01562-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Anthony B. Gordon law@anthonybgordon.com, lindagordon@socal.rr.com jonathan.shapiro@wilmerhale.com Jonathan Acker Shapiro Michael A Mugmon michael.mugmon@wilmerhale.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?