Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California et al v. Salazar et al

Filing 29

ORDER APPROVING 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2010 is CONTINUED to 10/8/2010 at 9:00 AM immediately following the Motion Hearing in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/14/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)

Download PDF
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California et al v. Salazar et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MELINDA L. HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney Northern District of California JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division CHARLES M. O'CONNOR (CSBN 56320) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7180 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 Email: charles.oconnor@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the Defendants **E-Filed 9/14/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, a federallyrecognized Indian Tribe; JAVIER MARTINEZ; SARAH GOODWIN; LENETTE LAIWA-BROWN; GERAD SANTANA and JOHN TRIPPO, in their official capacities as members of the Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Tribal Council; and COMMITTEE TO ORGANIZE THE CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA GOVERNMENT, an unincorporated association, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) KENNETH L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the ) Department of the Interior; et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. C 10-1605 JF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER -(-P---p--se--) - ro - o -- d - Date: September 24, 2010 Time: 10:30 a.m. Pursuant to the Clerk's Notice filed August 18, 2010, a Case Management Conference for 25 this action was set for September 24, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. 26 On August 20, 2010, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint was filed 27 and noticed for hearing on October 8, 2010. 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On September 3, 2010, Proposed Intervenor-Defendant Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California filed the following motions and notice them for hearing on October 8, 2010: Motion for Intervention; Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Named Plaintiff; and, Motion for Sanctions. WHEREAS, the rulings on the motions now set for hearing on October 8, 2010 will all have a potential bearing on both the future course of this case and the participants in the case, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties and the proposed intervenor-defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Case Management Conference set for August 18, 2010 may be continued to a date after the hearing on the motions set for October 8, 2010. Respectfully submitted, FREDERICKS PEEBLES & MORGAN LLP /s/ By: STEVEN J. BLOXHAM, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: September 9, 2010 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference; Order (Proposed) Cloverdale Rancheria v. Salazar C 10-1605 JF JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ By: CHARLES M. O'CONNOR Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants Dated: September 9, 2010 Page 2 1 2 KAZHE LAW GROUP PC /s/ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 9, 2010 By: ROSE M. WECKENMANN Attorneys for Proposed IntervenorDefendant, Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management 9:00 am following the October 8 -----Conference is hereby continued to ____________________, 2010 at 10:30- a.m. motion hearing. 14 Dated: September __, 2010 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference; Order (Proposed) Cloverdale Rancheria v. Salazar C 10-1605 JF Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?