Pitcher v. Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Filing 81

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/9/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Aaron A. Roblan, State Bar No. 244308
[e-mail]
Erica K. Rocush, State Bar No. 262354
[e-mail],
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Mark C. Peters, State Bar No. 160611
[e-mail]
DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP
100 Battery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Laraine Pitcher
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
Case No. C 10-01759 LHK

LARAINE PITCHER
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
20
21

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41

ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., a New York
corporation,
Defendant.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Laraine Pitcher (“Plaintiff” or “Pitcher”) and Defendant Arrow

22
Electronics, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Arrow”) (collectively, “the Parties”) have agreed to fully
23
24
25

settle the instant action;
WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a settlement and executed a Confidential

26

Settlement Agreement resolving all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant, including all claims

27

arising under the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA,” 29 U.S.C. § 621, et.

28

seq.) in exchange for valuable consideration;

10243959_1

Case No. C 10-01754 LHK

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby jointly and respectfully request that the Court,

2

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), discontinue and dismiss with prejudice the

3

above-titled action as to all parties, with each party bearing her or its own fees and costs.

4
5

DATED: May 9, 2011

6

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

7
8

By: /s/ Erica K. Rocush __________________
Aaron A. Roblan
Erica K. Rocush
Attorneys for Defendant Arrow
Electronics, Inc.

9
10
11
12

DATED: May 9, 2011

DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ
OLIVIER LLP

13
14
15

By: /s/ Mark C. Peters
Mark C. Peters
Attorneys for Plaintiff Laraine Pitcher

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10243959_1

2
Case No. C 10-01754 LHK
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having been advised by the Parties that a Settlement Agreement was entered into,

3

pursuant to which Plaintiff Laraine Pitcher has agreed to release all claims, including all claims

4

arising under the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA,” 29 U.S.C. § 621, et.

5
6

seq.) against defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc. in exchange for valuable consideration, the
matter of Laraine Pitcher v. Arrow Electronics, Inc., et al., United States District Court,

7
Northern District of California, Case No. C 10-01754 LHK, is, by reason of the settlement,
8
9
10

hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all parties, each party to bear her or its own
costs and fees. The Clerk shall close the file.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

May 9, 2011
Dated:_____________________

______________________________
Hon. Lucy Koh
United States District Court

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10243959_1

3
Case No. C 10-01754 LHK
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL