Quia Corporation v. Mattel, Inc. et al

Filing 100

ORDER re Discovery Disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/18/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

1
2

*E-FILED 05-18-2011*

3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

7

No. C10-01902 JF (HRL)

QUIA CORPORATION,

12

Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

13

v.

14
MATTEL, INC. and FISHER-PRICE, INC.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
18

With respect to any and all future discovery disputes, the parties’ attorneys shall meet

19

and confer in person, face-to-face about the dispute in a good faith effort to resolve the matter

20

without court intervention. The meet-and-confer shall be attended by lead counsel for each

21

side. If lead counsel are not the most familiar with the issues to be discussed, then the

22

attorney(s) who are most knowledgeable shall also attend the meeting. If such negotiations,

23

conducted in good faith, fail to resolve the matter, only then may a party file a motion seeking

24

judicial intervention. On any such motion, the moving party must certify compliance with this

25

order. See Civ. L.R. 1-5(n); 37-1(a).
SO ORDERED.

26
27

Dated:

May 18, 2011

28
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

5:10-cv-01902-JF Notice has been electronically mailed to:

2

Bobby A. Ghajar

3

Kelly Wong Craven

4

Mark J. Nagle

5

Peter Edward Moll , Esq

6

Robert L. Meylan

7

Shaunt Toros Arevian

8

Shaw Pittman

9

Steven Marc Weinberg

[e-mail]

[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail]

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

[e-mail], [e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2